Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #PostHoc
Most recents (1)
It's Good Friday.
As a sacrifice to Science, I'm going to criticise every single paper I've ever written, one tweet at a time.
Stay tuned..!
#ImAVeryNaughtyBoy
As a sacrifice to Science, I'm going to criticise every single paper I've ever written, one tweet at a time.
Stay tuned..!
#ImAVeryNaughtyBoy
Paper #1: Holmes & Spence 2004 @xmodal
Criticism: A non-systematic review of selected papers, no assessment of study quality, bias, or effect sizes. The only novel thing in this paper was a long, harsh critique of Iriki et al. (1996)
#SelfCriticism
doi.org/10.1007/s10339…
Criticism: A non-systematic review of selected papers, no assessment of study quality, bias, or effect sizes. The only novel thing in this paper was a long, harsh critique of Iriki et al. (1996)
#SelfCriticism
doi.org/10.1007/s10339…
Paper #2: Skaliora et al. 2004
Criticism: I contributed only one figure (#8) to this paper, but >30 neonatal rats paid the ultimate price for my crappy patch-clamping skills (only 17 cells) as an MSc student. I still feel the guilt.
#SelfCriticism
doi.org/10.1152/jn.004…
Criticism: I contributed only one figure (#8) to this paper, but >30 neonatal rats paid the ultimate price for my crappy patch-clamping skills (only 17 cells) as an MSc student. I still feel the guilt.
#SelfCriticism
doi.org/10.1152/jn.004…
