Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #RafaleCase
Most recents (2)
#GujaratHighCourt beings hearing the criminal revision plea filed by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) seeking a stay on his conviction in the defamation case over his remark “why all thieves share the Modi surname” made during a political campaign in 2019. 
Senior Advocate Nirupam Nanavaty appears for Complainant-Purnesh Modi before the bench of Justice Hemant M. Prachchhak. #GujaratHighCourt #DefamationCase #RahulGandhi #Defamation #ModiSurname twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
In the earlier hearing of the case, Senior Advocate Abhishek Singhvi (@DrAMSinghvi) appeared on behalf of Rahul Gandhi.
The details of his arguments could be read here:
#DefamationCase #GujaratHighCourt #DefamationCase #RahulGandhi #ModiSurname
livelaw.in/high-court/guj… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The details of his arguments could be read here:
#DefamationCase #GujaratHighCourt #DefamationCase #RahulGandhi #ModiSurname
livelaw.in/high-court/guj… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Today #Rafale hearing at 3pm!
The #SupremeCourt is considering whether to admit the #ReviewPetition by @YashwantSinha, Arun Shourie & @pbhushan1: bit.ly/2u5QvVx
1/n
#RafaleDeal #RafaleFilesStole #RafaleScam #cagreport #cagrafalefile #cagrafalereport
The #SupremeCourt is considering whether to admit the #ReviewPetition by @YashwantSinha, Arun Shourie & @pbhushan1: bit.ly/2u5QvVx
1/n
#RafaleDeal #RafaleFilesStole #RafaleScam #cagreport #cagrafalefile #cagrafalereport
@YashwantSinha, A Shourie & @pbhushan1 are seeking a review of the #SupremeCourt's #Rafale judgment on 4 main grounds:
1) Judgment did not deal with the main prayer of one of the petitioners (P Bhushan): filing of an #FIR & a #CBI led investigation
...
2/n
1) Judgment did not deal with the main prayer of one of the petitioners (P Bhushan): filing of an #FIR & a #CBI led investigation
...
2/n
...
2) Judgment relied on a large number of major factual errors
3) Critical material evidence was suppressed from the Court
4) Judgment did not consider critical facts submitted by the petitioners
3/n
#Rafale #SupremeCourt #RafaleDeal #RafaleReview #RafaleScam #RafaleFiles
2) Judgment relied on a large number of major factual errors
3) Critical material evidence was suppressed from the Court
4) Judgment did not consider critical facts submitted by the petitioners
3/n
#Rafale #SupremeCourt #RafaleDeal #RafaleReview #RafaleScam #RafaleFiles
