Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #SupremeCourtOfIndia

Most recents (24)

Justice Ashok Bhushan led bench to shortly hear an urgent application moved seeking clarification on the aspect of facilities for isolation rooms at CLAT exam centres to enable the applicant, who is infected with #COVID19, to write the exam.

#SupremeCourt
#CLAT2020
#clat
The matter was item 4. But it is being taken up first.
#CLAT2020
Bench assembles.

Advocate Garima Prashad for applicants: we want the COVID19 infected students be allowed to appear in isolation rooms

SC: we are not giving general orders. we are only permitting your client to appear in isolation room. take a print out of the order
Read 7 tweets
सर्वांनी नक्की‌ वाचा..
तुम्ही ऐकलच असेल की काल #Vodafone विरुद्ध भारत सरकार च्या केसचा निकाल आला आणि व्होडाफोनचे जवळपास 22,100 करोड रुपये वाचले.आज या धाग्यामध्ये आपण ती केस नक्की काय होती व आता सरकारने vodafone ला किती रुपये द्यायचे आहेत हे पाहुया..#म #मराठी #रिम Image
काल बातमी आली की Vodafone ने भारत सरकारविरुद्ध असलेली 22,100 करोड रू.ची केस आंतरराष्ट्रीय लवादामध्ये जिंकली.
सुरूवातीला एक संकल्पना स्पष्ट करू इच्छितो:-
'Capital gain and withholding tax‌' म्हणजे-
समजा तुम्ही 1 लाखाला सोनं खरेदी केल आणि भविष्यात तुम्ही ते 1.5 लाखाला विकत असचाल
तर जो 50 हजारचा अतिरिक्त लाभ तुम्हाला झालाय त्याच्यावरच्या कराला capital gain tax असे संबोधले जाते🙏
उदा.व्होडाफोनने 'हच' 50 करोडला खरेदी केले आणि हच ला capital gain झाल्यामुळे त्यांनी सरकारला 1 करोड tax द्यायचा आहे,तर व्होडाफोनने
Read 14 tweets
[UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF TRIBUNAL RULES 2020]

Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice L. Nageswara Rao is currently hearing a batch of petitions pertaining to appointments to Tribunals and challenging the constitutionality of Tribunal Rules 2020.

#TribunalRules2020
In the previous hearing, Sr. Adv. Arvind Datar, appearing on behalf of Madras Bar Association, made his submissions with reference to the unconstitutional nature of the Rules.

livelaw.in/top-stories/tr…

#TribunalRules2020
Today, Attorney-General KK Venugopal is making his submissions.

He takes the Bench through the 2020 Rules pertaining to the appointment to various Tribunals.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia #TribunalRules2020
Read 10 tweets
#SupremeCourt's CJI Bobde led bench is hearing a plea by Tata Sons against Cyrus Mistry owned Pallonji Group's fund raising plans.
Tata sons are opposing Pallonji Group raising funds by pledging Tata Sons shares.
Senior Advocate CA Sundaram appears for Mistry.
Sundaram: Articles of Association deal with transfer, not with pledge. A person cannot be prevented to pledge.
Read 10 tweets
TATA vs MISTRY:

Supreme Court Bench headed by CJI SA Bobde is hearing a plea by Tata Group challenging the pledging of its shares by Cyrus Mistry's Shapoorji Pallonji group in order to raise funds.

#SupremeCourt
Senior Counsel Aryama Sundaram for Mistry tells the Court that in the present application, Tata is attempting to stop SP group from pledging the shares.

Sundaram: This creating extreme havoc

#SupremeCourt #TataVsMistry
SC asks Senior Advocates appearing for all the parties when the matter can be heard for final hearing, proposes taking up the case after four weeks for final hearing.
Read 13 tweets
< 𝗧𝗼𝗽 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲𝘀 >
#Supremecourt's #CJI SA Bobde led bench to pronounce orders in a plea by @medhanarmada, seeking directions to the Maharashtra High Powered Committee for interim release of prisoners from Maharashtra jails amid the pandemic
#SupremeCourtOfIndia
The bench is about to assemble and will pronounce the judgment shortly.

@medhanarmada #prison #Covid_19 #Supremecourtofindia
Read 4 tweets
3 Intervenors - OPIndia, Indic Collective Trust & Upword Foundation seek to intervene in the ongoing
@SudarshanNewsTV case in SC.

#BindasBol
@OpIndia_com
@indiccollective
@upword_
@jsaideepak
#UPSC_Jihad
#SupremeCourtOfIndia
The intervenors question whether its "constitutionally permissible" for the Supreme Court of India to "judicially legislate a new species of impermissible speech,
namely Hate Speech"?

@SudarshanNewsTV
@SureshChavhanke
@OpIndia_com
@indiccollective
@upword_
@jsaideepak
Plea questions whether a Constitutional Court is cloaked with the necessary jurisdiction to directly restrain content during the pendency of an examination by appropriate State authority on legality of the content under applicable laws?"
@OpIndia_com
@indiccollective
@upword_
Read 3 tweets
SC bench led by Justice SK Kaul will hear a plea today, against anti-CAA protests after nearly 7 months.
PIL was filed in the top court seeking direction for immediate dispersal of Shaheen Bagh protestors or any other such sites in view of the pandemic.
#caa_nrc
@Shaheenbag Image
Top Court had notice to Centre on petitions seeking clearance of the ongoing protests against #CAA #NRC at Shaheen Bagh in Delhi on February 10.
Justices SK Kaul & KM Joseph had orally remarked, "There cannot be indefinite protests in a common area'.
#caa_nrcprotests
SC reserves its judgment on the aspect of "the need to balance the right to protest with the right of mobility by other people".
"The experiment, whether successful or not, calls for an order in this regard," said Justice Kaul.
#ShaheenBagh
#caa_nrc
#supremecourtofindia
Read 3 tweets
SC's Bench led by Justice Ashok Bhushan To shortly pronounce judgment on the validity of the conduct of a separate National Law Aptitude Test (NLAT2020) of the National Law School of India University (NLSIU).

#NLAT2020
@NLSIUofficial
#CLAT2020
#SupremeCourtOfIndia Image
A bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy & MR Shah had reserved the judgment on the plea filed by former VC of @NLSIUofficial & an aggrieved parent of a CLAT aspirant on September 17 & listed for pronouncement today.

#NLAT2020
#CLAT2020
#SupremeCourtOfIndia Image
On September 11, SC had allowed the @NLSIUofficial to conduct the Admission Test-NLAT2020 as per the schedule, i.e. on September 12.
However, Bench had restrained the Administration from declaring the results and making Admissions.
#NLAT2020
#CLAT2020
Read 6 tweets
𝑽𝑬𝑹𝑫𝑰𝑪𝑻 𝑨𝑳𝑬𝑹𝑻 - 𝑵𝑳𝑨𝑻 2020

Supreme Court to deliver its judgement today on petitions challenging the NLSIU's decision to hold a separate law entrance exam for the University this year.

#NLAT #SupremeCourtOfIndia @NLSIUofficial #CLAT2020 #CLATvsNLAT
Three Judge Bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash Reddy and MR Shah is scheduled to deliver the judgment shortly.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia #NLAT2020 #CLAT2020 @NLSIUofficial
Earlier the Supreme Court had allowed the NLSIU to proceed with the entrance exam.

However, the Court had said that the results of this test would be subject to the final judgment of the Court.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia #NLAT2020 #CLAT2020 @NLSIUofficial
Read 9 tweets
The #SupremeCourt declines to entertain a PIL which sought a declaration that there is no Freedom of Expression as regards subjudice matters and final orders except to the extent of fair and true reporting.

CJI Bobde: Read the law and you'll find what you're saying is the law. Image
Petitioner in person, Dr. Subhash Vijayran: Issue is how the media is acting these days and the faith of the people in the Court is getting eroded.

CJI Bobde: Your motives are good and noble but you are trying to get a relief which we cannot give.
CJI Bobde: It is like saying nobody should commit murder... It is true that nobody should commit murder but how can an order be passed for this. You withdraw the petition, we will not dismiss it.

(Petitioner withdraws PIL)

#SupremeCourtOfIndia
#FreedomOfExpression
Read 4 tweets
Supreme Court Bench headed by CJI rejects a PIL which sought direction from the Court for implementation of laws against Contempt of Court.

CJI: This is like you're saying that Court should pass an injunction that there should not be rapes and murders.

#SupremeCourt Image
CJI Bobde: We are in full agreement that there should be no contempt of Court.... But, we cannot pass orders like this.

This is unnecessary. There is a law in place then why should we pass orders saying law should be followed?

#SupremeCourt
#ContemptOfCourt
CJI Bobde: How can any court in the world direct the citizens to comply with laws and not break them?

#SupremeCourt
Read 5 tweets
Sᴜᴅᴀʀsʜᴀɴ TV Hᴇᴀʀɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ Rᴇsᴜᴍᴇ
《Live Thread》

Justice DY Chandrachud led bench will hear the plea challenging @SudarshanNewsTV 's #UPSC_Jihad program at 12 pm. Senior Adv Shyam Divan for channel will argue to vacate the earlier injunction order

#SupremeCourt
Earlier the top court had injuncted @SureshChavhanke from airing the program detailing about how Muslims were infiltrating UPSC services. Sudarshan News claims the show is about the illegal foreign funding tied to terrorist linked organizations in minority UPSC coaching centres
Senior Adv Shyam Divan for @SudarshanNewsTV will begin arguments today citing how the injunction order needs to be vacated in view of freedom of press and speech.

Petitioners maintain the show disturbs communal harmony in the country and unjustly targest the largest minority.
Read 154 tweets
[BREAKING] Attorney General KK Venugopal denies consent in plea seeking contempt proceedings against Rajdeep Sardesai. AG says the tweets by Sardesai were "not so serious" that could "undermine the majesty of court."
@sardesairajdeep
#ContemptofCourt Image
AG Venugopal says that triffling remarks and mere passing criticism though perhaps distasteful are unlikely to tarnish the image of the Supreme Court
@sardesairajdeep
#SupremeCourt
#contemptofcourt
[Breaking] AG KK Venugopal declines to give consent to initiate contempt proceedings against Rajdeep Sardesai
@sardesairajdeep
#SupremeCourtOfIndia #SupremeCourt #contemptofcourt
barandbench.com/news/breaking-…
Read 3 tweets
BREAKING: AG KK Venugopal declines consent for initiation of criminal contempt proceedings against @sardesairajdeep for a series of statements made on Twitter.

#CriminalContempt #ContemptofCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia Image
The AG’s letter states that the tweets of @sardesairajdeep are not of “so serious a nature as to undermine the majesty of the Supreme Court or lower its stature in the minds of the public”.

#CriminalContempt #SupremeCourtOfIndia
“The reputation of the SC as one of the great pillars of our democracy has been built assiduously over the last 70 years. Trifling remarks and mere passing of criticism though perhaps distasteful are unlikely to tarnish the image of the institution”.

@sardesairajdeep #Contempt
Read 3 tweets
[UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF TRIBUNAL RULES 2020 MATTER]

Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice L. Nageswara Rao is hearing a batch of pleas concerning the appointment to tribunals and the constitutionality of Tribunal Rules, 2020.

#TribunalRules2020 #SupremeCourtOfIndia
In yesterday’s hearing, Sr. Adv. Arvind Datar, appearing on behalf of Madras Bar Association, had submitted that not allowing advocates to be appointed as judicial officers in tribunals was arbitrary.

Details of the same can be read here. 👇🏽

livelaw.in/top-stories/tr…
Matter has begun. Sr. Adv. Arvind Datar commences his submissions.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia #TribunalRules2020
Read 63 tweets
BREAKING: Supreme Court has upheld the arbitration award in favour of Vedanta.

Court also observed that the Malaysian court had examined the issue rightly and the award did not offend public policy of India as it is an subsequent event.
#Vedanta #SupremeCourtOfIndia
Further, enforcement court cannot reassess evidence.

Central Govt. had appealed against the arbitration award which allowed Vedanta & Videocon to recover $499 million, instead of $198 million capped by CG, for development of Ravva oil & gas fields off AP coast b/w 2000 & 2007.
The Malaysian Courts had rightly applied the Malaysian law. The enforcement court would decide the enforceability of the foreign award in India as per the provisions of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996: SC
Read 5 tweets
A Justice Ashok Bhushan led bench of the Supreme Court to shortly hear a plea by former NLSIU VC Prof Dr. Venkata Rao challenging the decision of the @NLSIUofficial to conduct the NLAT as the basis for admissions to its law courses this year, instead of the #CLAT

#SupremeCourt Image
On the earlier date, the top court had allowed the conduct of #NLAT , however it had ordered that no results would be announced or admissions would take place till the pendency of the case.

#nlatvsclat
#NLAT
Bench assembles.

Senior advocate Nidesh Gupta: May I take your lordship to the Act first. Request others to mute themselves
Read 62 tweets
Chaudhari: I want to show some graphics. They have used Urdu graphics as well. What does this mean?

Justice Chandhrachud: We want to also hear the Solicitor General. What do you say?
@sudarshannewstv
#SupremeCourtOfIndia
#sudarshannews
#bindasbol
Justice Chandrachud adds: An anathema on 19(1)(a) to impose censorship but at the same time human dignity has to be taken into account and some standards have to imposed which in fact, go beyond this program.

@sudarshannewstv

#SupremeCourtOfIndia
#sudarshannews
#bindasbol
SG: Law available for your Lordships assistance.

SG relies on Bonard v. Perryman, an 1891 ruling.

@sudarshannewstv

#SupremeCourtOfIndia
#sudarshannews
#bindasbol
Read 88 tweets
Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice L. Nageswara will shortly hear the a batch of pleas concerning appointments to Tribunals, along with the challenge to the Tribunal Rules, 2020.

#Tribunals #SupremeCourtOfIndia
Sr. Adv. Arvind Datar commences the submissions. He states that they have filed the writ petition challenging the 2020 Rules.

#Tribunals #SupremeCourtOfIndia
Justice Rao asks Attorney-General KK Venugopal (who is in self-isolation after his colleague was found COVID-19 positive) whether he is well.

AG: Yes, yes. I’m fine.

#Tribunals #SupremeCourtOfIndia
Read 47 tweets
< 𝐒𝐮𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐓𝐕’𝐬 “𝐔𝐏𝐒𝐂 𝐉𝐢𝐡𝐚𝐝” 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐰 >
Top Court to hear a plea against the Sudarshan TV programme acclaimed as a ''big expose on the conspiracy" of Muslims indulging in "infiltrating government service''.

#SupremeCourtofIndia
@SureshChavhanke
Though top court had refused to pass a pre-broadcast injunction order against the show, expression of views derogatory to a particular community had a "divisive potential" & the petition had raised significant issues bearing on the "protection of constitutional rights".
The court while doing so had thus issued notice to Union of India, Press Council of India, News Broadcasters Association as well as Sudarshan News, returnable today.

#sudharshantv #UPSC
Read 10 tweets
A Justice Ashok Bhushan led bench of the Supreme Court will today hear an anticipatory bail plea filed by former Punjab Director General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini---an accused in the 1991 Balwant Singh Multani murder case

#SupremeCourt
#anticipatorybail
@PunjabPoliceInd Image
Saini has challenged the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s September 7 order dismissing his anticipatory bail plea in the Multani kidnapping and murder case.

@PunjabPoliceInd have also filed a caveat to pre-empt Saini from getting any ex-parte relief from the top court.
Senior Adv Mukul Rohatgi appears for Saini: This is a very serious matter. My client has risen from the ranks who became the DGP. he was a decorated officer and was in the thick of militancy in Punjab. He suffered 5 bullet injuries.
Read 24 tweets
SC Bench led by CJI is considering a petition filed by activist Medha Patkar seeking temporary release of prisoners from Maharashtra jails on account of the risk of spread of COVID-19.

@medhanarmada
#Covid_19
#SupremeCourtOfIndia
The SLP challenges Bombay HC's decision to uphold the Maharashtra State High Powered Committee's recommendations to not release on emergency parole those prisoners convicted for offences punishable with less than 7 years under Special Acts such as NDPS Act, UAPA, MCOCA etc.
Full report of the plea can be read here
livelaw.in/top-stories/me…
Read 6 tweets
Former civil servants from an informal collective "Constitutional Conduct Group" seek to intervene in a plea before the Supreme Court against @SudarshanNewsTV 's #UPSCJihad program on the issue of recruitment of Muslims in UPSC.
@SureshChavhanke
@Vakeel_Sb
Plea states that several legal provisions prohibit, criminalize, or otherwise penalize what is colloquially known as "hate speech." The applicants have urged the court to set out the scope and meaning of hate speech for more clarity on the subject.
[Breaking] Former civil servants move Supreme Court to intervene in "UPSC Jihad" case, raise need for authoritative ruling on hate speech
#SupremeCourtOfIndia
#UPSC_Jihad #UPSCJihad @SureshChavhanke @SudarshanTVnews @Vakeel_Sb
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Read 3 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!