Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #TGAgate
Most recents (3)
アメリカとかで流行ってるっぽい枠珍の疑惑系タグを独断で一通りまとめてみました🧐
どれもヤヴァイですが、改めて枠珍の毒性を総合的に認識しなおしましょう🧐
まずはmRNA枠珍そのものが人体に及ぼす疑惑一覧表🧐
この表の各々のリスクが相互に及ぼす影響はあえて聞かないでくれ・・・🥺
（1/15）
どれもヤヴァイですが、改めて枠珍の毒性を総合的に認識しなおしましょう🧐
まずはmRNA枠珍そのものが人体に及ぼす疑惑一覧表🧐
この表の各々のリスクが相互に及ぼす影響はあえて聞かないでくれ・・・🥺
（1/15）
次に、企業組織系の疑惑一覧表🧐
世界中で組織ぐるみの隠蔽疑惑が起きていますので、日本でも同じように、組織ぐるみで隠ぺいする悪しき企みは、間違いなく存在するのでしょうね🙄
これら以外にも、研究者個人名を含む疑惑タグが結構ありましたが、あえて割愛します🙄
（2/15）
世界中で組織ぐるみの隠蔽疑惑が起きていますので、日本でも同じように、組織ぐるみで隠ぺいする悪しき企みは、間違いなく存在するのでしょうね🙄
これら以外にも、研究者個人名を含む疑惑タグが結構ありましたが、あえて割愛します🙄
（2/15）
以下、これまで表に示した各項目の詳細です🧐
#plasmidgate
プラスミドdsDNA 混入疑惑
・LNPにDNA断片を封入して世界中のヒトに導入
・逆転写によらず遺伝子改変される
・胎盤移行した場合、末代まで祟られる
note.com/hiroshi_arakaw…
#dsDNA
（3/15）
#plasmidgate
プラスミドdsDNA 混入疑惑
・LNPにDNA断片を封入して世界中のヒトに導入
・逆転写によらず遺伝子改変される
・胎盤移行した場合、末代まで祟られる
note.com/hiroshi_arakaw…
#dsDNA
（3/15）
BREAKING: After uncovering gross incompetence (or negligence) at the TGA @SenatorRennick asked them what they did about the clearly contaminated batches.
Their response:
"We didn't see any problems"
#humpgate #TGAgate
Their response:
"We didn't see any problems"
#humpgate #TGAgate
The response confirms that the TGA were not competent to assess this product, given that the EMA identified the contamination.
Full thread below:
Full thread below:
This response was completely disingenuous because you cannot find a protein that you are not looking for.
Without mRNA sequencing (which they didn't do) they would have no idea what protein to look for.
Protein sequencing is complex, but they didn't do that either.
Without mRNA sequencing (which they didn't do) they would have no idea what protein to look for.
Protein sequencing is complex, but they didn't do that either.
BREAKING CHEESE 🧀🧀🧀
#humpgate #TGAgate
1⃣ We found the humps.
2⃣ the EMA knew about them
3⃣ the analysis appears to be synthetic
@chrismartenson @stkirsch @Daoyu15 @Kevin_McKernan
#humpgate #TGAgate
1⃣ We found the humps.
2⃣ the EMA knew about them
3⃣ the analysis appears to be synthetic
@chrismartenson @stkirsch @Daoyu15 @Kevin_McKernan
Just a reminder that these are the same humps that we found in the TGA batch analyses here
They are contaminants at 3000nt and 2000nt length. The main mRNA should be about 4000nt length.
They are contaminants at 3000nt and 2000nt length. The main mRNA should be about 4000nt length.
The EMA knew about these humps because they had them analysed. But only to a point.
Not only did they ONLY perform on analysis on the assumption of what they THOUGHT was in the product, but they accepted what now appear to be synthetic Western blots as evidence.
Not only did they ONLY perform on analysis on the assumption of what they THOUGHT was in the product, but they accepted what now appear to be synthetic Western blots as evidence.
