Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #TreacherousChina
Most recents (2)
This is for my friend @sambitswaraj Why must you always resort to lies & half truths?
-1996 Agreement is for Border Management not a Border Defence document
-Restrain of weaponry is true for border patrolling in peace time, not when enemy has intruded into our territory
-1996 Agreement is for Border Management not a Border Defence document
-Restrain of weaponry is true for border patrolling in peace time, not when enemy has intruded into our territory
-Veterans like Lt Genl HS Panag @rwac48 say there is no restriction on carriage of weapons
-Has also said "when lives of soldiers or territory is threatened by the enemy,commander on the spot can use all weapons at his disposal, including artillery fire."
-Has also said "when lives of soldiers or territory is threatened by the enemy,commander on the spot can use all weapons at his disposal, including artillery fire."
-So whose decision was it to send our soldiers unarmed?
- @DrSJaishankar has said soldiers were armed, so is he suggesting that the battalion stood there and witnessed its commanding officer being bludgeoned without reacting even when they had arms? STOP INSULTING THE INDIAN ARMY
- @DrSJaishankar has said soldiers were armed, so is he suggesting that the battalion stood there and witnessed its commanding officer being bludgeoned without reacting even when they had arms? STOP INSULTING THE INDIAN ARMY
Congress signed the pact of weaponless patrolling on LAC with China.
It was the Cong govt under PVNR. Further during HDDG govt.
Chinese action violates 1993, 1996, and 2013 border agreements.
Somebody please educate this Retard.
#IndiaChinaFaceOff
It was the Cong govt under PVNR. Further during HDDG govt.
Chinese action violates 1993, 1996, and 2013 border agreements.
Somebody please educate this Retard.
#IndiaChinaFaceOff
m.economictimes.com/news/defence/c…
Indian army were carrying arms but as per protocol and agreements earlier signed by Cong Govt did not use their arms where as the Chinese used medivial weapons like batons and rods against our Soldiers.
Why do we have such lame agreements ❓
Indian army were carrying arms but as per protocol and agreements earlier signed by Cong Govt did not use their arms where as the Chinese used medivial weapons like batons and rods against our Soldiers.
Why do we have such lame agreements ❓
