Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #TribunalOrdinance
Most recents (4)
TRIBUNAL REFORMS ORDINANCE: JUDGMENT
#SupremeCourt to shortly deliver verdict on a plea by Madras Bar Association challenging Sections 12, 13 of the Tribunal Reforms Ordinance, 2021 and Sections 184 and 186(2) of the Finance Act, 2017 as amended by the Ordinance
#tribunals
#SupremeCourt to shortly deliver verdict on a plea by Madras Bar Association challenging Sections 12, 13 of the Tribunal Reforms Ordinance, 2021 and Sections 184 and 186(2) of the Finance Act, 2017 as amended by the Ordinance
#tribunals
One of the moot point of the hearing was whether the retrospective effect given to Section 184(11) of Finance Act would override the judgments of the Supreme Court.
#supremecourt #tribunalordinance
#supremecourt #tribunalordinance
Madras Bar Association had argued that challenged provisions are in "contravention of principles of separation of powers, independence of the judiciary (both being part of the basic structure of our Constitution), and are against efficient and effective administration of justice"
#SupremeCourt bench led by Justice L Nageswara Rao to resume hearing a plea by Madras Bar Association challenging Sections 12 & 13 of the #Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) #Ordinance, 2021 (Ordinance) & Sections 184 and 186(2) of the Finance Act, 2017
Attorney General for India, KK Venugopal will pick up from where he left yesterday. AG had argued how the impugned laws were a result of the collective decision-making process of the Central government & why it does not warrant any executive interference
#supremecourt
#tribunal
#supremecourt
#tribunal
A detailed account of yesterday's hearing:
#SupremeCourt #TribunalReforms
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
#SupremeCourt #TribunalReforms
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
#SupremeCourt bench led by Justice L Nageswara Rao to shortly hear a plea challenging Sections 12 and 13 of the #Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) #Ordinance, 2021 (Ordinance) and Sections 184 and 186(2) of the Finance Act, 2017 as amended
The plea by Madras Bar Association states the challenged provisions are in "contravention of the principles of separation of powers, independence of the judiciary (both being part of the basic structure of our Constitution)
#SupremeCourt
#TribunalOrdinance
#SupremeCourt
#TribunalOrdinance
Plea states that first proviso to Section 184(1) provides for a minimum age limit of 50 years and that it is "arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the directions of Supreme Court in R Gandhi, Rojer Mathew and, in particular, Madras Bar Association case.
Supreme Court bench led by Justice L Nageswara Rao hears the plea challenging Tribunal Reforms Ordinance, 2021 filed by Madras Bar Association
#SupremeCourt
#tribunalordinance
#SupremeCourt
#tribunalordinance
Senior Advocate Arvind Datar to argue today. Arguments to continue on June 2. Attorney General KK Venugopal to begin submissions on June 2.
#supremecourt
#supremecourt
Justice Rao: will the hearing finish on Wednesday?
Senior Adv Datar: Hopefully
AG: I will take about two hours
Senior Adv Datar: Hopefully
AG: I will take about two hours
