Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #TribunalReforms
Most recents (4)
#SupemeCourt to hear a plea by Congress leader Jairam Ramesh challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 3(7), 5 and 7 (1) of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, which received presidential assent on August 13, 2021
#tribunalreforms @Jairam_Ramesh
#tribunalreforms @Jairam_Ramesh
Read details of the plea here: barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Bench assembles
Sr Adv Vikas Singh: This judgment by your bench was delivered in 2020 and now this act has been passed which is violative of the same.
I cannot hear you My Lord
#sUPREMECOURT
Sr Adv Vikas Singh: This judgment by your bench was delivered in 2020 and now this act has been passed which is violative of the same.
I cannot hear you My Lord
#sUPREMECOURT
#SupremeCourt bench led by Justice L Nageswara Rao to resume hearing a plea by Madras Bar Association challenging Sections 12 & 13 of the #Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) #Ordinance, 2021 (Ordinance) & Sections 184 and 186(2) of the Finance Act, 2017
Attorney General for India, KK Venugopal will pick up from where he left yesterday. AG had argued how the impugned laws were a result of the collective decision-making process of the Central government & why it does not warrant any executive interference
#supremecourt
#tribunal
#supremecourt
#tribunal
A detailed account of yesterday's hearing:
#SupremeCourt #TribunalReforms
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
#SupremeCourt #TribunalReforms
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
#SupremeCourt bench led by Justice L Nageswara Rao to shortly hear a plea challenging Sections 12 and 13 of the #Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) #Ordinance, 2021 (Ordinance) and Sections 184 and 186(2) of the Finance Act, 2017 as amended
The plea by Madras Bar Association states the challenged provisions are in "contravention of the principles of separation of powers, independence of the judiciary (both being part of the basic structure of our Constitution)
#SupremeCourt
#TribunalOrdinance
#SupremeCourt
#TribunalOrdinance
Plea states that first proviso to Section 184(1) provides for a minimum age limit of 50 years and that it is "arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the directions of Supreme Court in R Gandhi, Rojer Mathew and, in particular, Madras Bar Association case.
Tribunal Reforms Ordinance, 2021 takes effect: Appellate authorities in 9 laws replaced with High Courts
#tribunals #tribunalreforms
#ordinance
barandbench.com/news/law-polic…
#tribunals #tribunalreforms
#ordinance
barandbench.com/news/law-polic…
In the Cinematograph Act, the Appellate Tribunal has been done away with. The concerned High Court will replace the Appellate Tribunal to hear appeals against decisions of the Board.
The ordinance has abolished the Appellate Board under the Copyright Act.
The ordinance also substitutes the Appellate Board with Commercial Courts (a division of the High Courts), which will exercise the Appellate Board’s powers.
The ordinance also substitutes the Appellate Board with Commercial Courts (a division of the High Courts), which will exercise the Appellate Board’s powers.
