Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #VanniyarReservation

Most recents (3)

#SupremeCourt to continue hearing pleas challenging Madras High Court judgment which declared the 10.5% internal reservation to the #Vanniyar community under the existing 20% #Reservation to Most Backward Classes by Tamil Nadu Government unconstitutional.
#VanniyarReservation
Senior Advocate Gopal Shankarnarayanan appearing for the respondent continues arguing...

Justice L Nageswara Rao- The identification of the Community has been done in 1994, Can it be said that the giving 10.5% is identification please focus on this and make your submissions.
Shankarnarayanan - in 1994 act it doesn't appear that there is a particular community, section 7 of the 1994 Act they are using the phrase that it includes the backward classes and as may be notified.
#VanniyarReservation
#Vanniyar
Read 46 tweets
#SupremeCourt continues hearing pleas challenging Madras High Court judgment which had declared the 10.5% internal reservation to the Vanniyar community under the existing 20% reservation to Most Backward Classes by Tamil Nadu Government unconstitutional.
#VanniyarReservation
Senior Advocate P Wilson appearing for the State places before the Court about the Sattanathan Commission, the basic data used was the census data. We want to show the extensive assessment done in the Sattanathan Commission for the implementation of reservation.
Wilson- My submission is that there has been a detailed thorough study in the Sattanathan Commission.

J L Nageswara Rao- All this has been already argued, we have marked all this two three times.
#VanniyarReservation
Read 22 tweets
#SupremeCourt hearing pleas challenging the Madras High Court judgment which had declared the 10.5% internal reservation to the Vanniyar community under the existing 20% reservation to Most Backward Classes by Tamil Nadu Government unconstitutional.
#VanniyarReservation
Bench: We are not inclined to the argument of referring the matter to a larger bench, you can start your arguments.
Due to non availability of Senior Advocate Abhishek Singhvi the petitioner are seeking a short accomodation.

The bench has asked other counsels to continue with their submissions.
Read 27 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!