Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #abolishqi

Most recents (12)

Something that deserves far more attention is that the police murders of George Floyd and Tyre Nichols (and many others) took place in front of multiple fellow officers who did nothing to protect the victim. This is like a flight crew doing nothing about a plainly drunk pilot. /1
What it conveys to me, among other things, is a deeply pathological institutional culture in which officers have internalized the notion that they are entitled to act as they see fit in the moment without being second-guessed—and certainly not by anyone who’s not a cop. /2
This is madness. People who are clothed with the extraordinary authority, discretion, and hardware that cops possess must understand that they are agents who must be willing and able to justify every decision they make on the job to the principles who hired and employ them—us. /3
Read 10 tweets
Big day for rights-violating govt officials who desperately want avoid having to explain to civil jurors why they (1) set a man on fire with tasers to prevent him from setting himself on fire; and (2) put an avowedly suicidal, now-deceased man in a cell with an obvious ligature.
The first case with the taser-incineration is Ramirez v. Guardarrama, and the facts are even more horrific than I've described. Dissent from denial of cert by Sotomayor, Kagan, and Breyer. supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf…
The second case with the idiotic jailers who put a suicidal man in a cell with a means to kill himself and then failed to call 911 while watching him strangle to death is Cope v. Cogdill. Dissent from denial of cert by Sotomayor.
supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf…
Read 5 tweets
This is a thread about the two most important qualified immunity cases on the Supreme Court's docket right now—and maybe ever. Earlier this year, the Fifth Circuit dismissed two Section 1983 cases against (1) TX jailers who did nothing as a suicidal inmate took his own life...
...right in front of them; and (2) TX cops who set a mentally ill man on fire in order to keep him from setting himself on fire (yes, you read that correctly). There's a word for people who need the amount of protection the CA5's qualified immunity doctrine provides: Monsters.
My friend Cate Stetson represents the petitioners in both cases. In her cert petitions (linked below), she dissects the respective CA5 decisions with surgical precision and demonstrates—respectfully but unsparingly—their flagrant departure from controlling legal standards.
Read 7 tweets
Think you’re cynical enough about qualified immunity? Trust me, you’re not. Must-read from @radleybalko. I’ll screenshot key passages below. RT if you’ve had enough of QI already.
#AbolishQI
#EndQualifiedImmunity
@AbolishQI
@campaigntoendqi
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
1. Cops commit indisputable rights violation.
CA10 bends over backwards to let them off the hook. (Must’ve been another day ending in Y.)
Read 6 tweets
CA10: To be clear—you were specifically trained that people have a right to record you in public but you still abused this guy for recording you, and now you think you should get qualified immunity?
Cops: Uh...
CA10: Just messing with you—of COURSE you get QI. And next time too!
Read 4 tweets
I've seen plenty of no-brainer cert petitions in my day, but this one—from a CA10 decision granting QI to cops who were specifically trained that there's a constitutional right to record police in public that they mustn't interfere with—takes the cake. Why?supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?fi…
1. It involves one of the most important constitutional rights SCOTUS has yet to weigh in on: the ability to record police in public to prevent govt from creating false narratives about things like murdering citizens, like MPD tried to do with George Floyd.businessinsider.com/police-initial…
2. No one seriously thinks modern QI has a shred of legitimacy, and virtually everyone agrees it was invented out of whole cloth in a blatant act of judicial policymaking that's supposed to offend a certain kind of jurist (hint: rhymes w "shmoriginalist").
chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewconten…
Read 10 tweets
Thread: What happens when you subject qualified immunity to rigorous empirical scrutiny?

You discover it’s even worse than you thought. MUCH worse.

Click through for excerpts. /1

@CatoInstitute @campaigntoendqi #AbolishQI #EndQualifiedImmunity
lawfareblog.com/unpacking-deca…
“Eliminate”
“Ideological priors”
Read 5 tweets
EDITORIAL: Banning qualified immunity is complicated

NARRATOR: Only if you believe the baseless self-serving prevarications of the LEO-lobby.
fredericksburg.com/opinion/editor… via @NewsInTheBurg
Like this whopper right here: Image
Empirically unsupported, factually false, and cynically self-serving. Know who’s *actually* on the hook for lawsuits against cops? Not cops—but we the taxpayers. nyulawreview.org/issues/volume-… Image
Read 5 tweets
Memo to SCOTUS: No matter how deep you bury your head in the sand, qualified immunity is still out there, ruining people's lives, infantlizing law enforcement, and destroying public confidence in and respect for the criminal "justice" system. You broke it, you fix it. #AbolishQI ImageImage
Amen. Image
It just keeps getting better. Image
Read 3 tweets
If you're finally realizing how utterly broken our criminal justice system is and you're not focused on our near-zero-accountability policy for police or the fact that prosecutors can coerce virtually anyone into pleading guilty to anything—you are missing the boat, my friend.
Read 4 tweets
NYT, Fox, Christian Science Monitor, heck, even the Economist is going after qualified immunity. SCOTUS is gonna need to rent a backhoe to get its head deep enough in the sand to drown out this drumbeat. #AbolishQI
economist.com/united-states/… Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Why JUDGES should support the elimination of qualified immunity: Because when YOU create a Frankenstein’s monster of injustice that undermines people’s confidence in govt and infantilizes cops, you should fix the mess you made.
How does QI “infantilize” cops? By consistently letting them off the hook on the premise that they could not reasonably have known not to do things that would put an ordinary citizen in the poorhouse--or prison. Think I’m exaggerating? Read on:
Here’s what cops did in the seven QI cases that SCOTUS just sent to conference for 5/15 where federal appellate courts gave the cops a free pass on the premise that they didn’t have sufficient notice not to do these things:
Read 12 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!