Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #accreditation
Most recents (3)
Finally, the #GoldacreReview is published! (During Parliamentary Easter holidays, mid-ping-pong on the #HealthAndCareBill...)
It's 221 pages - each PDF page is a double page spread - so this could be a lo-o-o-ong [Thread].
Here goes...
It's 221 pages - each PDF page is a double page spread - so this could be a lo-o-o-ong [Thread].
Here goes...
First point to note, in the Terms of Reference (p5), is that this is about "access to #NHSdata by #researchers, #commissioners, and #innovators" - i.e. #Planning and #CommercialReUse - so it is directly relevant to the operation of millions of people's #NationalDataOptOuts... 
"185 wide-ranging recommendations for us to explore", says @sajidjavid (p6). Gulp! Time for some coffee...
"systems that ensure #underrepresented groups are well represented" may (partly) refer to this "landmark review", which got off to a slow start:
gov.uk/government/new…
"systems that ensure #underrepresented groups are well represented" may (partly) refer to this "landmark review", which got off to a slow start:
gov.uk/government/new…
Buenos días from #NACIQI meeting! @TheToniFlores and I are here to let you know what's going on. Up next: Diane Auer Jones from @usedgov
@TheToniFlores @usedgov Jones highlights the elimination of the "artificial" distinction between regional and national accreditors, congratulates WASC for doing so. Jones doesn't think this will encourage institutions to go for the "easier" accreditor, but consumer advocates think otherwise. #NACIQI
Pre-accredited status is the same as accredited status, argues Jones. I'm wondering why there is a "pre-" status then...Accreditors only award pre-accredited status if they're "pretty darn sure" the institution can be awarded accredited status. #NACIQI
