Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #adiz
Most recents (6)
Let me understand this really well, 🇺🇸🇨🇦 #NORAD QRA fighters didn't shoot down the 🇨🇳 Chinese spy balloon in American, then Canadian, then American airspace? 😂
YOU HAD ONE JOB.
🤦♂️
YOU HAD ONE JOB.
🤦♂️
They flew right through the #ADIZ that the media get their bloomers in a bunch about when the Russians fly antiques through, and VIOLATED American and Canadian airspace, which the Russians never do, and the Chinese continue to do; did I get that right? What a bunch of bullsh!t.
I suspect the #USAF are flying their own spy drones over China on the regular, without the public's knowledge, in full view of the Chinese military, and they're terrified the Chinese will start shooting them out of the sky if they shoot down the balloon.
Update: Yes the RAF QRA fighters did launch AND intercept the Tu-160s before they turned around.
FYI, @Reuters has not yet made the required corrections to their article that would make it truthful and accurate. It was published over 24hrs ago, and syndicated worldwide, spreading their misinformation globally.
reuters.com/world/russian-…
reuters.com/world/russian-…
🇷🇺 On 2021-11-12 the Russian Air Force (#RuAF) made a long range aviation training sortie, which included 2x Tu-160 strategic bombers and tanker support, in international airspace.
Those are facts.
Those are facts.
🇧🇪 In international airspace, they were shadowed by the Belgian Air Force.
🇳🇴 In international airspace, they were shadowed by the Norwegian Air Force.
How many media organisations, alleged-journalists, and pundits, will display their ignorance by not looking up what an Air Defence Identification Zone #ADIZ is, and call it #Taiwan's airspace, which it is not.
Let's keep a running tab; I've dragged many of them previously.
Let's keep a running tab; I've dragged many of them previously.
In no particular order:
Reminder: a check mark has nothing to do with accuracy or integrity, and @eha_news is clearly not a trustworthy source. They published misinformation at best, or disinformation they were not aware of, and issued no corrections or retractions when corrected. 🤷♂️
They're not alone.
They're not alone.
The narrative wasn't corrected at the onset it's now spread like wildfire. Finding the same lie across multiple checkmarked accounts does not make it true. Parroting a lie doesn't absolve journalists from reporting the truth, and this isn't it. 👇
Without much fanfare, Indonesia quietly issued Government Regulation (PP) No. 4/2018 on Airspace Security. The PP was meant to further establish the governance of Indonesia's airspace (per Law No. 1/2009 on aviation) <thread on #ADIZ> 1/
2/ The PP basically establishes the governance of Indonesia's airspace, who manages what and how as well as the procedures for certain scenarios (e.g. how to intercept a foreign aircraft, admin fines, etc.). In that sense, the PP is a generic framework for airspace management
3/ what is interesting is possible creation of Air Defense Identification Zone (#ADIZ) (art. 6) in addition to the establishment of prohibited and restricted areas (for the latter, PP said "govt. establishes..." and for ADIZ, it says "govt. *could* establish..."
