Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #ayodhyadisputehearing

Most recents (8)

Day 18

#Ayodhya case.

Supreme Court issues contempt notice to Prof N Shanmugam for allegedly threatening Sr. advocate Dhavan for representing Muslim parties.
Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan (RS) resumes his arguments on behalf of Sunni Waqf Board.

#AyodhyaHearing
Dr. Rajeev Dhavan arguing for the plaintiffs in suit 4 is reading out excerpts from the written statement of Hindu Maha Sabha, represented by Adv. H S Jain to indicate the averments made therein.
Read 48 tweets
Day 17.

#Ayodhya case.

Bench has assembled.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal mentions contempt petition filed by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan against Prof N Shanmugam for allegedly threatening Sr. advocate Dhavan for representing Muslim parties

CJI orders to list contempt petition tomorrow.
Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan (RD) commences his arguments on behalf of Sunni Waqf Board.

Dhawan: Today is the 18th day of the hearing My lords, on 18th Day Mahabharat starts.

#ayodhyadisputehearing
RD : I have no intention whatsoever to break decorum of the court. It is universally recognised that i am irritating. My second apology is to Mr. Mishra. I think a counsel has a right in this court to not to be disturbed.

#ayodhyadisputehearing
Read 69 tweets
Day 16

#AyodhyaHearing

A five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.

Hearing resumed.
Sr. Adv. P N Mishra continuing.

P N Mishra reading out a hadith to indicate that in prophet's time when dispute arose between Muslims and Jews, Justice was administered by the book of the Jews.

#AyodhyaHearing
PN Mishra is also submitting, with support of Hadith, that 2 qibla (direction of worship) in one place. He submits that 2 places of religious worship cannot exist in the same site.

#AyodhyaHearing
Read 48 tweets
Day 14

#AyodhyaHearing

A five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.

PN Mishra continuing his arguments.
PN Mishra is clarifying the issue regarding contradictory directions being shown in Map handed by Mr. Mishra as compared to others.
PNM: First time anyone saw inscription on the wall was first in 1946 when the magistrate went and it has been accepted that inscriptions were placed again in 1934. So these inscriptions are placed in 1934.
Read 33 tweets
Day 11

#AyodhyaHearing

A five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.
Jain: My lords had put a question, I'll answer but the matter is serious and I'll need a little time.

CJI: We are looking for pin pointing arguments.

Jain: My lords just give the same courtesy as given in Suit 5.

#AyodhyaCase
CJI: No Mr. Jain you have extensively argued on Limitation already, you have to argue on oral and documentary evidence, for that you take a day, it won't take a week.
Read 44 tweets
Day 10

#AyodhyaCase

A five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.

Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar (RK) resumes arguments for plaintiff in Suit No.1 (Gopal Singh Visharad)

#ayodhyadisputehearing
RK: What has been stated in the prayer is the place of Janmabhumi. I am adopting the argument of Mr. Parasaran and Mr. Vaidyanathan that the place itself is a diety and i have been worshipping it and it is civil right which should not be curtailed.

#ayodhyadisputehearing
Reading WS of defendants Muslim parties, Mr. Ranjit Kumar submits that the 1885 proceedings that they claim would be acting as res judicata was only limited to Ram Chabutra.

#ayodhyadisputehearing
Read 79 tweets
Day 9

#AyodhyaHearing

Bench has assembled.

Senior advocate C S Vaidyanathan resumes his arguments for that deity (Ram Lalla).
CSV: High Court having held that the suits are barred by time could not have granted the relief it granted. This is my submission. Relief granted to waqf board and Nirmohi Akhara is nothing contemplated in any law.

#AyodhyaHearing
CSV now citing cases in support of submission that if hindus are having the belief and faith to worship the place of birth, it should be treated as religious worship.

#AyodhyaHearing
Read 75 tweets
Day 7

#Ayodhyahearing.

Bench assembled.

CSV reading report of the commissioner appointed to inspect the site, who inspected the site on 16.04.50 and again on 30.04.50. CSV reads out portion describing presence of kasauti pillar containing image of shankar bhagwan.
DYC: it just says that an image of shanker bhagwan is there, no indication which pillar or if it was carved or a picture

CSV: yes my lords it doesn't say.

#AyodhyaHearing
CSV: this gives a very clear picture feom the inspection in April 1950. This was being worshipped as a place of divine significance. and in a place with such symbols my lord, to say muslims can pray, will not be fair.

#AyodhyaHearing
Read 36 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!