Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #banremoteaccess

Most recents (7)

Dear @senatemajldr: Throwing wads of $$$ at opaque & corrupt voting-system vendors that donated to your campaign does NOT constitute meaningful election-security reform. Thread. cc: @SenSchumer @SenatorLeahy @ChrisCoons 1/
Election-security funding must be tied to election-security requirements (or it isn’t really election security funding):

HAND MARKED paper ballots 4 most voters

ROBUST manual audits

A ban on internet connectivity & remote access

Backup paper voter lists at polling places. 2/
Read 8 tweets
The #SAFEAct, which @HouseDemocrats just passed, would:

* Require #HandmarkedPaperBallots as an option for all voters
* Require #RiskLimitingAudits
* #BanBarcodeVoting
* #BanHybridVoting
* #BanRemoteAccess
* #BanInternetConnectivity.

Thank a House Democrat today! TY. 1/
Here’s a detailed thread about the #SAFEAct. Pls reference these key provisions when asking the Senate to pass the Act. Thank you! 2/
3/ Graphic by @frontera_julie!
Read 4 tweets
Talking Points for the #SAFEAct, which the House just passed. Pls amplify that the Act would:
* Require #HandmarkedPaperBallots as an option for all voters
* Require #RiskLimitingAudits
* #BanBarcodeVoting
* #BanHybridVoting
* #BanRemoteAccess
* #BanInternetConnectivity TY! 1/
2/ Graphic by @ArtistsPo!
3/ Here is a more detailed and sourced thread explaining these key terms and why they are important. TY.
Read 8 tweets
Talking Points for the #SAFEAct, which the House just passed. Pls amplify that the Act would:
* Require #HandmarkedPaperBallots as an option for all voters
* Require #RiskLimitingAudits
* #BanBarcodeVoting
* #BanHybridVoting
* #BanRemoteAccess
* #BanInternetConnectivity TY! 1/
2/ Here is a more detailed thread explaining what these provisions mean and why they are so important.
3/ Please begin tagging members of @GOPSenate and asking them to confirm that they agree with these election-security best practices. If they won't respond, please follow up. Please be polite. Thank you!
Read 4 tweets
Here are some talking points to promote the #SAFEAct, which @HouseDemocrats just passed. Let's help them get the word out that the Act would:
* Require #RiskLimitingAudits
* Require #HandmarkedPaperBallots as an option for all voters
* #BanBarcodeVoting
* #BanHybridVoting
1/
3/ Here is a more detailed thread explaining why these key provisions are so important.
Read 6 tweets
This is a major victory bc it means we are successfully exposing the recklessness of rejecting #HandmarkedPaperBallots in favor of machine-marked summary cards from vendors’ insecure “universal use” barcode ballot marking devices & hybrids, which the #SAFEAct would ban. 1/
It also shows that we have successfully exposed as unacceptable ES&S’s installation of wireless modems in election equipment, which it began doing in 2015. This too would be banned under the #SAFEAct. 2/
Yes, I get that McConnell may not bring it to the floor. But we would be negligent to not even try. So we will try & in doing so educate a TON of people—include decision makers at the state and county level—about the election-security best practices embodied in the Act. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Our leaders must do more than say “PAVEAct.” They must explain what it would do & why it matters so that (a) even Republican voters question why Mitch won’t put it up for a vote; & (b) voters know what to demand from local officials too. @GeorgeLakoff 1/
2/ Our leaders need training in negotiations it seems. You can’t create pressure or change w/o leaders providing a little bit of detail as to what is wrong and what is needed.

#HandmarkedPaperBallots
#BanBarcodeVoting
#BanHybridVoting
#BanWirelessModems
#BanRemoteAccess
Democrats should publicly SHAME Republicans for wanting to keep remote access and wireless modems in election equipment. Everyone should be able to understand why this is outrageous. Why won’t Democrats even try to shame them on this?! 3/
Read 3 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!