Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #blotgate
Most recents (10)
アメリカとかで流行ってるっぽい枠珍の疑惑系タグを独断で一通りまとめてみました🧐
どれもヤヴァイですが、改めて枠珍の毒性を総合的に認識しなおしましょう🧐
まずはmRNA枠珍そのものが人体に及ぼす疑惑一覧表🧐
この表の各々のリスクが相互に及ぼす影響はあえて聞かないでくれ・・・🥺
（1/15）
どれもヤヴァイですが、改めて枠珍の毒性を総合的に認識しなおしましょう🧐
まずはmRNA枠珍そのものが人体に及ぼす疑惑一覧表🧐
この表の各々のリスクが相互に及ぼす影響はあえて聞かないでくれ・・・🥺
（1/15）
次に、企業組織系の疑惑一覧表🧐
世界中で組織ぐるみの隠蔽疑惑が起きていますので、日本でも同じように、組織ぐるみで隠ぺいする悪しき企みは、間違いなく存在するのでしょうね🙄
これら以外にも、研究者個人名を含む疑惑タグが結構ありましたが、あえて割愛します🙄
（2/15）
世界中で組織ぐるみの隠蔽疑惑が起きていますので、日本でも同じように、組織ぐるみで隠ぺいする悪しき企みは、間違いなく存在するのでしょうね🙄
これら以外にも、研究者個人名を含む疑惑タグが結構ありましたが、あえて割愛します🙄
（2/15）
以下、これまで表に示した各項目の詳細です🧐
#plasmidgate
プラスミドdsDNA 混入疑惑
・LNPにDNA断片を封入して世界中のヒトに導入
・逆転写によらず遺伝子改変される
・胎盤移行した場合、末代まで祟られる
note.com/hiroshi_arakaw…
#dsDNA
（3/15）
#plasmidgate
プラスミドdsDNA 混入疑惑
・LNPにDNA断片を封入して世界中のヒトに導入
・逆転写によらず遺伝子改変される
・胎盤移行した場合、末代まで祟られる
note.com/hiroshi_arakaw…
#dsDNA
（3/15）
1/50 #Science is an ongoing process that serves to investigate phenomena, gain new insights or "correct prior knowledge" and this only works in #discourse. This includes diversity of #Opinion, #tolerance and a broad debate space. This is a large thread.
2/50 "#trust the science" is in my view the most #antiscience statement ever. #Questioning science is how you do #Science. This thread gives some examples and further questions.
scientificamerican.com/article/why-do…
scientificamerican.com/article/why-do…
3/50 What about good ##scientific #Practice? I found a glaring example here (of all things, in what I consider to be a rush to #vaccine #approval). #blotgate
trialsitenews.com/a/startling-ev…
trialsitenews.com/a/startling-ev…
BREAKING 🧀🧀🧀
#Blotgate hits the big time with a breakdown on @EpochTimes and @zerohedge
The report in this article was based on our findings published here on twitter
@sonia_elijah @chrismartenson
theepochtimes.com/health/pfizer-…
#Blotgate hits the big time with a breakdown on @EpochTimes and @zerohedge
The report in this article was based on our findings published here on twitter
@sonia_elijah @chrismartenson
theepochtimes.com/health/pfizer-…
Follow-up report.
10th Jan 2023.
#blotgate
Please follow the hashtags for more threads and tweets
@JesslovesMJK
@MidwesternDoc
10th Jan 2023.
#blotgate
Please follow the hashtags for more threads and tweets
@JesslovesMJK
@MidwesternDoc
@IanCopeland5 is acting for the US Dept of defense performing this role. They set him up with a shell genomics company to frame him as an authority.
The implications of this are profound....
The tweet ignoring responses and mocking dissenters is irrelevant
The implications of this are profound....
The tweet ignoring responses and mocking dissenters is irrelevant
Under normal circumstances a "free" society relies on the judiciary to act in the public's interest to protect from tyrannical governments. But the judiciary is captured, just like in nazi Germany.
So the last stop is the military. Who are they working for?
So the last stop is the military. Who are they working for?
Now you have your answer.
The military are the only entity who have the resources to force the rollout of the failed gene therapy vaccines and support the fraud needed to sell it, such as #blotgate
It's the same in the UK
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
The military are the only entity who have the resources to force the rollout of the failed gene therapy vaccines and support the fraud needed to sell it, such as #blotgate
It's the same in the UK
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
BOMBSHELL: The western blots submitted to the FDA & EMA as well as used to justify the approvals, look to be completely falsified. This according to a deep investigation done by @sonia_elijah. Pfizer’s were copied & pasted, proven via forensic analysis.
trialsitenews.com/a/startling-ev…
trialsitenews.com/a/startling-ev…
Could this be why Pfizer and the FDA wanted the clinical trial data hidden for 75 years?
This, if corroborated is the definition of a Smoking Gun.
Shall we trend? #PfizerExposed #pfizerblots
This, if corroborated is the definition of a Smoking Gun.
Shall we trend? #PfizerExposed #pfizerblots
Some key questions asked by @sonia_elijah that beg for answers.
1How did the “copy and paste” data sail through the radar of the regulators?
1How did the “copy and paste” data sail through the radar of the regulators?
.@elonmusk this is not OK
The engagement on this account is high, twitter blue is enabled and there are 40K followers
This important tweet was suppressed within 2 hours of its posting, having had 100 RT within minutes
The engagement on this account is high, twitter blue is enabled and there are 40K followers
This important tweet was suppressed within 2 hours of its posting, having had 100 RT within minutes
I have been at this long enough to know when a tweet is gaining traction organically and when it is being suppressed.
This one has been suppressed and the shadowban is in place.
You asked for $8(US) a month - fine so I agreed. Nowhere in the T&C does it say...
This one has been suppressed and the shadowban is in place.
You asked for $8(US) a month - fine so I agreed. Nowhere in the T&C does it say...
That you could or would (under set circumstances) shadow ban the account.
Nothing in these tweets is false, misleading or offensive (except maybe to people who make false claims about things that they are selling).
You even said this
help.twitter.com/en/using-twitt…
Nothing in these tweets is false, misleading or offensive (except maybe to people who make false claims about things that they are selling).
You even said this
help.twitter.com/en/using-twitt…
New Cheese 🧀🧀🧀on #Blotgate - The emerging scandal that keeps on giving.
The EMA and FDA reviews of the Pfizer BNT162b2 molecular biology assays were not independent reviews at all.
Pfizer wrote their documents.
@chrismartenson
The EMA and FDA reviews of the Pfizer BNT162b2 molecular biology assays were not independent reviews at all.
Pfizer wrote their documents.
@chrismartenson
The paper that David is referring to is published as a "peer reviewed" paper in @JPharmSciences
Except it wasn't that at all, it was a submission by Pfizer in response to the EMA and FDA questions posed in relation to their gene therapy product.
[PDF: jpharmsci.org/action/showPdf…]
Except it wasn't that at all, it was a submission by Pfizer in response to the EMA and FDA questions posed in relation to their gene therapy product.
[PDF: jpharmsci.org/action/showPdf…]
It has simply been reconstituted as a "peer reviewed" manuscript.
These are the claims in the paper but they are not shown to be true.
Let's ignore the "safe and effective" claim for obvious reasons
These are the claims in the paper but they are not shown to be true.
Let's ignore the "safe and effective" claim for obvious reasons
WHOA!!!!
Absolutely busted.
Great work on #blotgate @MidwesternDoc to put this into a visible format.
Now we need criminal investigations.
#blotgate #humpgate and #pfizertaggate are not going away.
@chrismartenson @JesslovesMJK
Absolutely busted.
Great work on #blotgate @MidwesternDoc to put this into a visible format.
Now we need criminal investigations.
#blotgate #humpgate and #pfizertaggate are not going away.
@chrismartenson @JesslovesMJK
Well #blotgate just blew up
@chrismartenson @SenatorRennick @JesslovesMJK
jessicar.substack.com/p/a-follow-up-…
@chrismartenson @SenatorRennick @JesslovesMJK
jessicar.substack.com/p/a-follow-up-…
#blotgate refers to this thread that exposed the comedy Westerns that Pfizer submitted to the FDA as proof of protein product.
But they turned out to be AWBs - "automated Western blots" which are not the same as Western blots at all
But they turned out to be AWBs - "automated Western blots" which are not the same as Western blots at all
Differences explained here
nature.com/articles/nmeth…
nature.com/articles/nmeth…
STINKY CHEESE🧀🧀🧀
What do you call something that's too good to be true from a company that has previously been convicted of fraud?
Yep. More cartoon Westerns, this time from Pfizer directly. Nobody checked them.
#Blotgate
👇👇👇
What do you call something that's too good to be true from a company that has previously been convicted of fraud?
Yep. More cartoon Westerns, this time from Pfizer directly. Nobody checked them.
#Blotgate
👇👇👇
The source document sent to me appears to be from those released under @AaronSiriSG @IamBrookJackson legal actions to investigate fraud in the Pfizer vaccine study that the FDA said they needed 75 years to release the documents.
Yet they assessed the 450,000 pages in 24 hours?
Yet they assessed the 450,000 pages in 24 hours?
I'll say that again.
There were 11 MILLION total documents (44,000 patients, minimum 250 pages per patient plus 350,000 assessment and summary documents).
The FDA was given the glossy summary on the 10th December.
The vaccine was "approved" on the 11th December.
There were 11 MILLION total documents (44,000 patients, minimum 250 pages per patient plus 350,000 assessment and summary documents).
The FDA was given the glossy summary on the 10th December.
The vaccine was "approved" on the 11th December.
