Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #caa19
Most recents (1)
<<Thread>>
1) The survey without asking papers which is being referred here is NPR & not NRC. The "buddhijivi" mixed up 2 different exercises here. The NPR exercise doesn't have to do anything with citizenship. It's meant to count RESIDENTS of India & NOT CITIZENS of India.
(1/7)
1) The survey without asking papers which is being referred here is NPR & not NRC. The "buddhijivi" mixed up 2 different exercises here. The NPR exercise doesn't have to do anything with citizenship. It's meant to count RESIDENTS of India & NOT CITIZENS of India.
(1/7)
So, the question of marking somebody "doubtful" does not arise.
2) By saying that just because of a person's religion, a 'D' will be marked, this man is trying to create 'dar ka mahaul". I would love to know his argument supporting this ha-te ful thought.
3) He adds that
(2/7)
2) By saying that just because of a person's religion, a 'D' will be marked, this man is trying to create 'dar ka mahaul". I would love to know his argument supporting this ha-te ful thought.
3) He adds that
(2/7)
before Modi govt., there used to be no Birth Certificate & just birth used to be THE proof.
Bro! I was born in the yr when BJP was just 3 yr old officially & I've a birth certificate.😀
4) Onus of proving citizenship, as per the criterion defined in the Citizenship Act 1955
(3/7)
Bro! I was born in the yr when BJP was just 3 yr old officially & I've a birth certificate.😀
4) Onus of proving citizenship, as per the criterion defined in the Citizenship Act 1955
(3/7)
