Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #canonlaw
Most recents (2)
The legal history of diversity is not a simple tale of progress from intolerance to tolerance, nor did it just take place in the ‘West’. We asked our colleagues for lesser-known turning points (positive and negative) over the centuries.
#GDD22 #DiversityAtMPG
A thread 👇👇👇
#GDD22 #DiversityAtMPG
A thread 👇👇👇
15/01/1955: The Federal Labour Court ruled that the principle of equal rights and the prohibition of discrimination (art.3(2)(3) 🇩🇪 Basic Law) include the principle of equal pay for women and men for equal work and that this principle binds the parties to collective agreements.
18/10/1929: In Edwards v AG of Canada, the Privy Council affirms that women may be appointed to the 🇨🇦 Senate, overruling the Canadian Supreme Court decision that women were not ‘persons’ under the relevant statute. Diversity through literal & liberal statutory interpretation!
1/ Heresy and English Canon Law – The first of two threads. #churchlaw #canonlaw
Unsurprisingly, this thread was prompted by a Twitterstorm over the last day or so. I will turn to the specifics of that, very briefly, at the end of the second thread.
Unsurprisingly, this thread was prompted by a Twitterstorm over the last day or so. I will turn to the specifics of that, very briefly, at the end of the second thread.
2/ But I don’t want to focus on specifics and won’t be engaging with the substance of what was said in that debate.
This first thread is about the nuts and bolts of how a heresy case would work in the CofE.
This first thread is about the nuts and bolts of how a heresy case would work in the CofE.
3/ Is heresy a disciplinary offence? Yes, even though the word is not used in our disciplinary legislation.
