Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #clinton2020
Most recents (3)
So, twice yesterday, and just now, for the second time today, a friend has written me about @HillaryClinton's intentions for 2020. Two have used the exact same phrasing in reference to it: "I want a rematch."
Another said, "She has to, she just does."
Run again that is...
1/
Another said, "She has to, she just does."
Run again that is...
1/
She, by the way, had been a Sanders supporter who wasn't even sure she would support Clinton in the general until about three weeks before election day.
More importantly, and I believe all of them to be sincere, each of them has promised the same thing.
2/
More importantly, and I believe all of them to be sincere, each of them has promised the same thing.
2/
If she does "I'm going to take leave from work for (3,2,2) 3 months and volunteer for the campaign
I get questioned about what I think she will do almost everyday by one of you, and two of the people above are Twitter folk too, but the intensity and number are up recently.
I get questioned about what I think she will do almost everyday by one of you, and two of the people above are Twitter folk too, but the intensity and number are up recently.
Some final thoughts on my run-in yesterday with @MichaelAvenatti and why, until much work on his part, he will never find my support on any political level.
I will also discuss @EdKrassen's much RT's accusation that I am a Russian troll.
First,the tweet that started it all:
1/
I will also discuss @EdKrassen's much RT's accusation that I am a Russian troll.
First,the tweet that started it all:
1/
I was filled with deep anger when I read Avenatti's first tweet, and even more so after reading his appeasement follow-up.
The tweets, in my opinion, show a more nuanced, but no less diabolical level of duplicity.
They are the height of "lawyerly," in the worst sense.
2/
The tweets, in my opinion, show a more nuanced, but no less diabolical level of duplicity.
They are the height of "lawyerly," in the worst sense.
2/
The first is a flat-out pitch to Clinton's far left critics, though he would deny wanting to become "Bernie 2.0" in his reply to me (he blocked me after writing it, and before I could screenshot it, a friend supplied the above one), he adopts Sanders' very arguments here.
3/
3/
No matter how much evidence.
No matter how clear the evidence.
It's been the same story for twenty five years.
They accuse her of wildly ridiculous claims. Ask @therealroseanne to tell you about Pizzagate. She's a real laugh.
@HillaryClinton will never be given a break.
1/
No matter how clear the evidence.
It's been the same story for twenty five years.
They accuse her of wildly ridiculous claims. Ask @therealroseanne to tell you about Pizzagate. She's a real laugh.
@HillaryClinton will never be given a break.
1/
They simply make things up and pass them off as facts, l knowing that it's the accusations that matter, not the truth.
People want to believe that people are bad and do awful things, all of the time. It's a sickness, but this one has a name.
Clinton Derangement Syndrome
People want to believe that people are bad and do awful things, all of the time. It's a sickness, but this one has a name.
Clinton Derangement Syndrome
C.D.S is a chronic condition that affects millions of Americans, and is widely considered to be the most widespread political mental illness in contemporary history.
Symptoms include advanced stage misogyny, paranoia, ignorance, delusions, and overexposure to @FoxNews
3/
Symptoms include advanced stage misogyny, paranoia, ignorance, delusions, and overexposure to @FoxNews
3/
