Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #defenceministry
Most recents (2)
WOW!
#DefenceMinistry wants an independent TESTING FACILITY for weapons produced by INDIAN Pvt co.s which wr at d mercy of Govt labs. COINCIDENCE?
Jst 2 weeks ago @major_pawan hd in a video explained how Pvt companies r suffering due to dependence on Govt labs.Gr8 decision!😃👏
#DefenceMinistry wants an independent TESTING FACILITY for weapons produced by INDIAN Pvt co.s which wr at d mercy of Govt labs. COINCIDENCE?
Jst 2 weeks ago @major_pawan hd in a video explained how Pvt companies r suffering due to dependence on Govt labs.Gr8 decision!😃👏
I am jst glad Govt is taking up issues that het discussed and finding a solution. It is in this video Maj Pawan hd explained and given the EXAMPLE of bullet proof jackets and how not having Pvt labs is increasing the cost and reducing efficiency.
Infact a few months ago #SSSDefence’s CEO, @Viv_Krishnan had mentioned the same issue. 👇I jst hope these impediments dont slow down Indian Armed forces & defence industry any more.
Today #Rafale hearing at 3pm!
The #SupremeCourt is considering whether to admit the #ReviewPetition by @YashwantSinha, Arun Shourie & @pbhushan1: bit.ly/2u5QvVx
1/n
#RafaleDeal #RafaleFilesStole #RafaleScam #cagreport #cagrafalefile #cagrafalereport
The #SupremeCourt is considering whether to admit the #ReviewPetition by @YashwantSinha, Arun Shourie & @pbhushan1: bit.ly/2u5QvVx
1/n
#RafaleDeal #RafaleFilesStole #RafaleScam #cagreport #cagrafalefile #cagrafalereport
@YashwantSinha, A Shourie & @pbhushan1 are seeking a review of the #SupremeCourt's #Rafale judgment on 4 main grounds:
1) Judgment did not deal with the main prayer of one of the petitioners (P Bhushan): filing of an #FIR & a #CBI led investigation
...
2/n
1) Judgment did not deal with the main prayer of one of the petitioners (P Bhushan): filing of an #FIR & a #CBI led investigation
...
2/n
...
2) Judgment relied on a large number of major factual errors
3) Critical material evidence was suppressed from the Court
4) Judgment did not consider critical facts submitted by the petitioners
3/n
#Rafale #SupremeCourt #RafaleDeal #RafaleReview #RafaleScam #RafaleFiles
2) Judgment relied on a large number of major factual errors
3) Critical material evidence was suppressed from the Court
4) Judgment did not consider critical facts submitted by the petitioners
3/n
#Rafale #SupremeCourt #RafaleDeal #RafaleReview #RafaleScam #RafaleFiles
