Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #delille
Most recents (1)
#DeLille has two legal arguments about remarks she made on The Eusebius McKaiser Show on 26 April.
1. She claims a proper interpretion of the words exchanged between her and the host does not support the @Our_DA interpretion.
2. Part of the DA constitution is unconstitutional.
1. She claims a proper interpretion of the words exchanged between her and the host does not support the @Our_DA interpretion.
2. Part of the DA constitution is unconstitutional.
Argument 1: De Lille says the @Our_DA quoted selectively from her interview with Eusebius McKaiser. At the end of said interview, and she cited the transcript, she said the DA is entitled to elect the Mayor and recall the Mayor. It follows she only intended resigning as Mayor.
Further she says an 'in context'- interpretation of her remarks show that it was a CONDITIONAL or hypothetical statement- *if* and only *if* she had been fairly subjected to due process, would she resign. She says that's PLAINLY what her words on The Eusebius McKaiser Show meant.
