Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #digitalforensics
Most recents (3)
🔥 Hot take 🔥
If you only pump out tool reports because you don't have time to do actual #DigitalForensics the only person you are fooling is yourself.
Cases dropped or plead low because the examiner couldn't be inconvenienced with looking into a database.
If you only pump out tool reports because you don't have time to do actual #DigitalForensics the only person you are fooling is yourself.
Cases dropped or plead low because the examiner couldn't be inconvenienced with looking into a database.
Acquittals because the examiner never took the time to understand the artifacts so they could be properly understood by the jurors.
But wait, you say, I press that Generate Report button like it's going out of business and that has never happened to me.
To that I say... Yet.
But wait, you say, I press that Generate Report button like it's going out of business and that has never happened to me.
To that I say... Yet.
Do we need to do this on all artifacts on all cases?
Of course not! But if the artifact matters YOU, the examiner, needs to verify that it is correct and if there is more to it than what the tool shows you.
Of course not! But if the artifact matters YOU, the examiner, needs to verify that it is correct and if there is more to it than what the tool shows you.
For everyone who responded to this #DFIR question below. I gathered all your feedback and put it into a repository which can be found below. I'll continue to update with everything related. #DigitalForensics #AntiForensics
github.com/ashemery/Anit-…
github.com/ashemery/Anit-…
I will add what we already cover in our anti-forensics course already
JFYI, if you check my past publications, you'll notice I've covered so many of what have been mentioned here back in 2015/2016 ... but I want to see if I'm missing anything new and it turned out YES, there is one/two that I did now know. Thank you all for sharing, appreciate it.
On Friday, Senator Pauline Hanson said One Nation registered 46 websites as part of its campaign to oppose the Indigenous Voice to Parliament. We (@arielbogle @doctorworkman) found ~31 of them, many redacted and some owner details were suppressed at the weekend. OSINT THREAD~
About two-thirds of these sites are registered under the registrant name or registrant org as "Pauline Hanson's One Nation", "ONE NATION QUEENSLAND DIVISION INC." or under the typo "Pauline Hanson' s One Nation". Searching via conventional traditional will only a handful of sites
The first websites, confirmed by the Daily Telegraph, were voicetoparliament.com.au and ulurustatement.com.au. The owner details for these two are still visible, the other 29 were never made public or had disappeared in the past five days since they were registered.
