p. 65: US intel distilled 35 pages of sourced material down to 1.5 pages to present to Trump in initial meeting, a "summary that focused on the allegation of coordination between the Russians and the [Trump] campaign." 2/
p.67: "All of the sources fit together and told a consistent story from different vantages in the Kremlin, Clapper said. These human sources had been so-called "legacy sources" -- they had been right in their intelligence and assessments over the years..." 3/
On February 27, 1933 the German Parliament building burned, Adolf #Hitler rejoiced, and the #Nazi era began. 1/
#Hitler, who had just been named head of a #government that was legally formed after the democratic #elections of the previous November, seized the opportunity to change the system. “There will be no mercy now,” he exulted. “Anyone standing in our way will be cut down.”
The next day, at Hitler’s advice and urging, the #German#president issued a decree “for the protection of the people and the state.”
Trump: Day 599
-Sz Hurricane is 'Tremendously Wet'
-Planned Visit 2 Ireland is Cancelled
-Expanding Tent City to 3,800 Beds
-Wants 2 Hire 21 Foreign Workers
-Deficit 2 Hit $1T by Fiscal Year End
-Russia Suspected of Cuba Attack
-"Fear" Loaded with Explosive Details
Day 704 since Donald Trump admitted to sexual assault — yet he’s still in the Oval Office
Day 556 of NO EVIDENCE produced by Trump that his phones were tapped by Obama.
The FISA warrant Trump referenced targeted Carter Page. #TrumpLies
THREAD: Some notes and thoughts from reading "Fear" yesterday. Firstly, as @HeathaT points out, it pays to collaborate on these projects: Bannon, Porter and Cohn seem major sources and all come off pretty well.
Some anecdotes: When Bannon was first asked to chat to Trump about a presidential run in 2010, he replied: "I don't have time for fucking nonsense...this guy's not serious.
In the subsequent meeting, Trump is told it's a problem that history shows him to be "very pro-choice."
Trump's response: "What does that mean?"
He is told what pro-choice means.
"That can be fixed," he says. "You just tell me how to fix that. I'm—what do you call it? Pro-life."
Here's dumbfuck talking about his voting record, asking "what's that" and is unsure about what you call it when you against abortion when Bossie and Bannon meet with Trump discussing a potential 2012 run against abortion. #Fear
This is more to that first meeting with Bossie, Bannon and Trump. #Fear
Contined from above
He's a fucking moron
I'm gonna keep adding excerpts on this thread for anyone that's waiting on their own book and bc I want to highlight how stupid he is.
The Unindicted Co-conspirator In Chief's point about the South is unfortunately going to appear far truer than it is when his southern supporters call this "Fake News" and stand around with their fingers in their ears going "Nyah. Nyah. Nyah." #Fear
This book must be packed with one reckless episode after another, and one gets the sense that the reviewer was trying hard to limit the scope of the review to as small a sample as possible.
There is clearly going to be much more in the book because given the revolving door nature of this administration's staff changes very few individual names even make the cut. Bannon only appears in one anecdotal arguments with Ivanka, who also only shows up once.
1-I need to look into what triggers shills to come to my account and why. Because when they do, they all seem to concentrate in the same posts and have (allgegdly) no connection to each other.
What's more, #memes seem to trigger them and not posts per se.
& specific #hashtags
2- @CIA and other shills are DICKS. you know why? Cos you are all morons enough to come at the same time and concentrate in the same FUCKING post?
Are you seriously that dumb?
I don't need a degree to teach u the basics of stealth and concealment,but apparently you need a lesson
3-So here is the lessons:
-If you want to seem genuine, you need to come at me at different times and concentrating on different posts.
-If you all come at me at once (pretending not to know each other) and talking about the same post, I know are all FUCKING SHILLS
[This post relates to Q’s previous post No.2405745:
Impossible to defend.
“Never Interfere With an Enemy While He’s in the Process of Destroying Himself.”
Welcome to the mainstream.
We knew this day would come.
(glimpse)(what to expect)
>POTUS’ twitter comments
Fake News WW
Fake MAGA supporters
Paid shills (Media Matters)
Intel infiltration (neg dissemination).
#Procrastination is funny.
Am I doing it because I'm bored? nah.
Do I want to do something else? no.
Totally afraid of fucking up.
So we'll sit here until the deadline waiting for me to not fuckup?
(telling on myself, to give myself a kick up the backside)
Step 1, draw borders
Step 2, draw something that looks like it follows the action on the previous page.
Step 3, write a bad line. (All it has to be is plausible, not finished)
Step 4, make the next panel to follow the first.
The Creators of the World’s Misfortunes
by Joseph Goebbels
"One could not understand this #war if one did not always keep in mind the fact that International J//ewry stands behind all the unnatural forces that our united enemies use to attempt to deceive the world and keep humanity in the dark.
"It is, so to speak, the mortar that holds the enemy coalition firmly together, despite its differences of class, ideology, and interests.
THAT IS NOT THE REAL PROBLEM!!!
There are many problems surrounding our #SHITHOLEPresident and his #SHITHOLE comments, but my issues are twofold, (ONE). the full contextual meaning of what he said, and
1/ #THREAD Ah, teeny tiny demographical instance of something, hastily wound up to a coy, careful kind of un-endorsement of something else, even uses paper in a medical / scientific journal to try substantiate this un-endorsement placement #Beware#BullAtWork How 'well-connected'
2/ and how reminiscent of a certain type of anti-vaccination trolling / disinformation.😬 #Questions such as: A/what percentage of the population actually use the product B/ what percentage of that specific demographic have been injured seriously, in a clinical sense or in the --
3/ particular mode described in the, eh, 'article' ? C/ So even if as seems likely this only verifiably happened to a tiny % of users,& even if the argument that it is all just public knowledge/public info. is applied so it appears to be, lets say for the heck of it, 'authentic',