Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #frauderendum
Most recents (3)
In 2015 parliament voted to allow advisory referendum. Because it was advisory no safeguards were attached
In 2016 HMG insisted vote was binding & opposition nor media challenged this lie.
BBC immediately reported we have left &opposition called for trigger of A50.
In 2016 HMG insisted vote was binding & opposition nor media challenged this lie.
BBC immediately reported we have left &opposition called for trigger of A50.
Referendum was advisory. As much as having false title deed to your property this matters
Supreme ct ruled in Miller that parliament had to decide.
PM didn’t ask parliament if they want to leave she merely asked if they will give her power to notify - once a decision is made.
Supreme ct ruled in Miller that parliament had to decide.
PM didn’t ask parliament if they want to leave she merely asked if they will give her power to notify - once a decision is made.
So having tricked Parliament and electorate into believing illusion parliament had decided, the PM sent the the letter to the EU.
Lord Justice gross held PM decided to strip rights of over 500bn people all based on fraud.
Lord Justice gross held PM decided to strip rights of over 500bn people all based on fraud.
From Liz Webster /Atricle 50 Challenge today:
New #brexit legal challenge launched #UKEUchallenge 😊 which builds on achievements of #A50challenge.
1. The Supreme Court ruled in Miller ministers alone can’t make major constitutional changes.
New #brexit legal challenge launched #UKEUchallenge 😊 which builds on achievements of #A50challenge.
1. The Supreme Court ruled in Miller ministers alone can’t make major constitutional changes.
From Liz Webster /Article 50 Challenge today
2. Our sovereign. Parliament has to make decisions by passing Acts which change the law.
3. @A50Challenge started proceedings in Nov 17 as many FOI requests to identify the decision to leave EU returned different answers.
2. Our sovereign. Parliament has to make decisions by passing Acts which change the law.
3. @A50Challenge started proceedings in Nov 17 as many FOI requests to identify the decision to leave EU returned different answers.
From Liz Webster /Atricle 50 Challenge today:
4. HMG in defence said a decision wasn’t needed.
5. On 12/6/18 court permission hearing ruled the PM made the decision to leave
4. HMG in defence said a decision wasn’t needed.
5. On 12/6/18 court permission hearing ruled the PM made the decision to leave
This decision of PM which impacts on every EU citizen is unconstitutional.
There’s been no due diligence, no parliamentary decision and, as she admits in the letter, it’s based purely on the referendum.
EC have confirmed it was #frauderendum.
The decision is tainted.
There’s been no due diligence, no parliamentary decision and, as she admits in the letter, it’s based purely on the referendum.
EC have confirmed it was #frauderendum.
The decision is tainted.
We embarked on @A50Challenge with the route map below, in pursuit of the decision. We expected to have to go to full hearing to find it.
It’s super *bonus* court took the opportunity to nail the decision down.
It now makes way for new challenges free of time bar.
It’s super *bonus* court took the opportunity to nail the decision down.
It now makes way for new challenges free of time bar.
If @A50Challenge had won right to hearing, the decision would still be knocking around like an out of control cannon ball.
Had a court found the decision was implied in Notification Act, it would’ve been fatal.
The route is now clear for new challenges to PM’s dodgy decision.
Had a court found the decision was implied in Notification Act, it would’ve been fatal.
The route is now clear for new challenges to PM’s dodgy decision.
