Account Share

Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #horowitz

Most recents (7)
Democrats and the REAL Russian Collusion.
The Obama administration’s Russian Reset began in Geneva on March 6, 2009. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton huddled with Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, and together they pressed a red button that should have been labeled “Reset” in Russian.
Instead, Hillary’s aides had mislabeled it with the Russian word for “Overload.” Regardless, once pushed, the button symbolized a red dawn of increasingly cozy U.S.–Russian affairs.
Read 48 tweets
1-#Thingstoponder
how come we are spied on in every possible way (#5eyes, #InQTel & hundreds others) and everything is valid to you (& me), the average guy to court, to get conviction, to... fucking it, everything is legal.
But 'we have everything', except that everybody is
2- #MakingADeal because we need to collect evidence in 'whatever legal way'?
Are you fucking kidding me?
None of you have a problem with that?
3-More venting later...
4-That compound that 'we blew up', did Trump speak out against that? If yes, please link me to it. If not, why not? Aren't the 'white hats' in control now? Why are we hiding evidence?
5-And if there is no condemnation and no talk, doesn't that mean that:
Read 65 tweets
(1) #TeamTrump #PhotoThread starting July 25, 2018.

🇺🇸Previous thread starting July 20:


🇺🇸40+ other threads like these: godlessnz.wordpress.com/2017/10/27/lin…

🇺🇸Unrolled versions: threadreaderapp.com/user/GodlessNZ

Below: A 94yo war veteran hugs POTUS on stage.
(2) "When @VP Pence, @SecretaryCarson, & @SecretaryPerry photo bomb our family photo! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸" - Rep @RogerMarshallMD from #KA01.

Rep Marshall was at the WH #MadeInAmerica showcase, supporting Kansas manufacturer @bgproducts.
(3) "@POTUS @realDonaldTrump and @IvankaTrump tour @U_S_Steel in Granite City, Illinois." -@Scavino45
Read 30 tweets
Did Thread Reader help you today?
Support me: I'm a solo developer! Read more about the story
Become a 💎 Premium member ($30.00/year) and get exclusive features!
Too expensive?
Make a small donation instead. Buy me a coffee ($5) or help for the server cost ($10):
Donate with 😘 Paypal or  Become a Patron 😍 on Patreon.com
Well it's pretty simple tbh

Would you like me to explain?
1/
Trump was referring to US/RU relations not the supposed "hacking"

I say supposed because it was already disproven by #Binney

The wider press dismissed it & referred to him as a conspiracy theorist, but failed to mention he's the former head of @NSA
2/
thenation.com/article/a-new-…
Given the fact that the @FBI were denied access to the server in favour of a private org (and DNC client), @CrowdStrike the question becomes:

Is #Mueller's indictment based on actual evidence from the server OR a report from crowdstrike?
3/
Read 66 tweets
Stand by for an instructive example of how false narratives and talking points are amplified by inaccurate media coverage. I will chain the tweest as replies to this one for those who are interested. #Wray #Horowitz #NoBias
It’s more reason you cannot necessarily believe what’s reported and repeated, no matter how many are reporting and repeating it. Make up your own mind. You can see for yourself.
Here’s a link to today’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. I’ll include time code notes on the subsequent tweets.
c-span.org/video/?446804-…
Read 15 tweets
1. I haven't had time yet to digest all of the report, but the few things I have looked for are much more damning than all the tweets I've been reading this afternoon. I think a lot of people are missing the primary thread so to speak.
2. While #Horowitz is saying he found no single smoking gun that proved the #ClintonEmail case was spiked for political reasons. He outlines lots of political bias & even more bad decisions. Out of policy decisions, decisions by people that should have been recused, etc.
3. So what if OIG had actually said “I our opinion this all adds up to prove bias”?
That would be a judgment call, right? And judgment calls are always questioned by someone with different judgment, especially if they are motivated to reach a different conclusion.
Read 19 tweets
IG has odd take on Lynch: She didn't discuss anything wrong with Bill Clinton & maybe it was okay to meet him, but was an "error" not to "cut the visit short"

So short meeting that doesn't discuss probe is OK -- but long meeting that doesn't discuss probe is an error?

#Horowitz
IG is clear on Comey, finding:

- he "concealed" secret plan to do the Seacresting presser re Clinton (as he admits in his book) &
- he was "insubordinate" to do so

(#Seacresting is a ref to how Comey's family said he was wrong to do the presser with reality show style mystery)
Full disclosure: Obv it's problematic that I can quote Comey's family's criticism of his presser from his book, #toomuchtimeon1story
Read 4 tweets
Related hashtags
Did Thread Reader help you today?
Support me: I'm a solo developer! Read more about the story
Become a 💎 Premium member ($30.00/year) and get exclusive features!
Too expensive?
Make a small donation instead. Buy me a coffee ($5) or help for the server cost ($10):
Donate with 😘 Paypal or  Become a Patron 😍 on Patreon.com