Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #impactassessments
Most recents (2)
Serious cognitive dissonance in @theresa_may’s Op-Ed.
Citizens of nowhere, we remember.
Hard red lines without any respect to a deeply divided result, we see now.
A refusal to apologise for the #HostileEnvironment.
EU citizens rights, we care. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Citizens of nowhere, we remember.
Hard red lines without any respect to a deeply divided result, we see now.
A refusal to apologise for the #HostileEnvironment.
EU citizens rights, we care. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
May claims a “decent, moderate and patriotic programme that is worthy of” Labour support.
So patriotic it deprives us of jobs?
So decent it leaves British citizens in Europe stranded?
So moderate it strips us of our right to study, travel, live, love & work in 27 countries? /2
So patriotic it deprives us of jobs?
So decent it leaves British citizens in Europe stranded?
So moderate it strips us of our right to study, travel, live, love & work in 27 countries? /2
May boldly asserts “The British people are not bound by ideology”.
Brexit is nothing but ideology.
There are no proven facts. There is a preposterous belief that we can do everything, as all the evidence before he flees to Paris, Berlin, Dublin. /3
Brexit is nothing but ideology.
There are no proven facts. There is a preposterous belief that we can do everything, as all the evidence before he flees to Paris, Berlin, Dublin. /3
The dishonesty of Brexit is insupportable.
Hiding behind a veil of negotiating secrecy means the country can’t analyse, openly & transparently, the hugely complex problems at stake.
Mansion House created multiples of further questions.
But it seems our govt has closed ears.
Hiding behind a veil of negotiating secrecy means the country can’t analyse, openly & transparently, the hugely complex problems at stake.
Mansion House created multiples of further questions.
But it seems our govt has closed ears.
To take just 1 issue - the proposed multiple sectoral agreements in place of a Single Market. What of the mechanism to adjudicate. Or the regulatory systems required. Or the cost of contribution. Or the new red tape. Or the actual loss of control & influence at the table. /2
Let’s try another. The dishonesty surrounding EU Charter. It’s a political decision to remove it from retained EU law. Or else why do it now?
Keep it in & then discuss how best we keep rights. Don’t lose them now. /3
Keep it in & then discuss how best we keep rights. Don’t lose them now. /3
