Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #jessesingal
Most recents (3)
Let's trace the self-alleged non-political cabal at play here. A cabal trying to change current principles of gender-affirmative care for trans youth. While conducting no original research of their own.
May I introduce, Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine (SEGM). 1/
May I introduce, Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine (SEGM). 1/
What do they do?
Mostly they lobby for "evidence-informed healthcare" for "children, adolescents, and young adults with gender dysphoria."
If you believe a society with that narrow a focus doesn't have very particular political goals, you must be freshly born. 2/
Mostly they lobby for "evidence-informed healthcare" for "children, adolescents, and young adults with gender dysphoria."
If you believe a society with that narrow a focus doesn't have very particular political goals, you must be freshly born. 2/
They made a bibliography to show that evidence for gender dysphoria treatments is "of very low quality" and that they are very concerned for gender-dysphoric youth.
They filed an amicus brief to challenge WPATH on mastectomy for adolescents.
They post online news releases. 3/
They filed an amicus brief to challenge WPATH on mastectomy for adolescents.
They post online news releases. 3/
#JesseSingal, true to form, keeps hammering his list of requested corrections on all doors.
Do others remember when he copied his lawyer in an email and said it was certainly not a legal threat? Now he says someone saying corrections might appear “Soon…” is “ominous.” 🙃
Do others remember when he copied his lawyer in an email and said it was certainly not a legal threat? Now he says someone saying corrections might appear “Soon…” is “ominous.” 🙃
One can read the DSM-IV as #JesseSingal does, hunting obsessively for those “misrepresentations” for which he then asks for corrections.
It’s been widely discussed though how changes in the DSM-V were to remove transness from being an identity disorder.
It’s been widely discussed though how changes in the DSM-V were to remove transness from being an identity disorder.
So no, dear outraged Jesse, it is not “profound sloppiness” and it does not “exhibit complete unfamiliarity” when one repeats what is widely established in the accompanying research and discussion.
The angry nerve of this man.
I hope someone can find it amusing.
The angry nerve of this man.
I hope someone can find it amusing.
