Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #michaelwebberleytribunal
Most recents (3)
Good morning. We will be reporting from the misconduct hearing of Dr Michael Webberley, co-founder of Gender GP in Manchester.
We're due to start at 9.30am.
#OpenJustice tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/tribunal-of-…
We're due to start at 9.30am.
#OpenJustice tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/tribunal-of-…
Michael Webberley applied for voluntary erasure from the GMC register which was rejected in March. The Tribunal considered requests for adjournment and determined the case should proceed in his absence.
Today, the tribunal will hand down their decision about
Michael Webberley's fitness to practise is impaired.
#MichaelWebberleyTribunal #OpenJustice
Michael Webberley's fitness to practise is impaired.
#MichaelWebberleyTribunal #OpenJustice
Tribunal Tweets also reports on medical practitioner tribunals.
A tribunal has found Dr Michael Webberley failed to provide good care with regard to patient consent forms, informed consent, prescribing & working within the limits of his expertise & the guidance.
#OpenJustice
A tribunal has found Dr Michael Webberley failed to provide good care with regard to patient consent forms, informed consent, prescribing & working within the limits of his expertise & the guidance.
#OpenJustice
Dishonesty was not proved in relation to operating Gender GP.
#MichaelWebberleyTribunal
#OpenJustice @tribunaltweets2
#MichaelWebberleyTribunal
#OpenJustice @tribunaltweets2
@tribunaltweets2 The Tribunal found dishonesty proved in relation to allegations concerning consent forms.
#MichaelWebberleyTribunal
#OpenJustice @tribunaltweets2
#MichaelWebberleyTribunal
#OpenJustice @tribunaltweets2
The medical practitioners tribunal has found that Dr Michael Webberley, who ran an online clinic prescribing testosterone to men in the UK and Gender GP, an online transgender clinic, failed to provide good clinical care to patients and was dishonest.
Some allegations were found not proved, on the balance of probabilities, the civil standard of proof used by the tribunal.
The decision has detailed consideration of the law and expert evidence and each element of the allegations and is 305 pages long.
The decision has detailed consideration of the law and expert evidence and each element of the allegations and is 305 pages long.
The tribunal found Michael Webberley's failure to provide good clinical care for patients related to consultations, history taking, examination, diagnosis, prescribing, delegated communication, follow up, assessment, working within the limits of his expertise and the guidance.
