Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #opensciecne

Most recents (1)

Commentary by Dijksterhuis, author of original study on behaviour priming that failed to replicate in most recent @RegReports, falls into usual post hoc explanations and lack of falsifiability. 1/n psychologicalscience.org/redesign/wp-co… #replicability #opensciecne
All degrees of freedom that are required to make the effect significant post hoc were foreseeable a priori. Eg exclude those who reporting being suspicious of the study's intent. If this data was collected + the original theory state it's an unconscious effect, 2/n
then why wasn't this employed as an exclusion criterion? Author reports not expecting such a high rate of suspicion, but it if was a priori relevant the rate wouldn't matter or could have had a design contingency. 3/n
Read 5 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!