Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #peerreviewed

Most recents (4)

@C0PE 1. A crucial #COVID19 paper (tinyurl.com/bp8m326t) with simple #solution that does not have any #vested interest is #retracted seven months after publication in a #PeerReviewed journal @SpringerNature where there could be #conflictofinterest @RetractionWatch.
@C0PE @SpringerNature @RetractionWatch 2.Retraction was initiated by an #influential scientist who doesn't have any research on #COVID. If s/he had co-authored papers with author in other areas, will there not be #ConflictofInterest?
Can it not be verified/disclosed? Who will check if there is #fairness of intention?
@C0PE @SpringerNature @RetractionWatch 3) There was no open #public #debate allowed before retraction. Then how #transparency is maintained and how the right of the author is protected? A negative review can be written for any paper and a paper rejected in one journal can also be published in another journal.
Read 6 tweets
1/ Joining some wonderful people from what I am seeing as a diverse group of researchers at the #EditorialBoard of @PLOSGPH; journal has given itself the tall order of “addresses inequities in public health and makes impactful research accessible to all… (1/n) #Threads
2/ In words of @paimadhu "the journal will amplify the voices of underrepresented and historically excluded communities and prioritize equity, diversity, and inclusion at all levels"; I am highly skeptical of this,
3/ yet I am thrilled that a #PublicHealth journal would give itself such a vision; #Knowledge #Science #Evidence all reproduce the same kind of social hierarchies that drive unfair accumulation of resources in our society
Read 12 tweets
1/ “It doesn't matter how many innovative podcast ideas u’ve had, its impact or how many you’ve inspired over the yrs

... all that matters is that you finish-- #papers.”

So, I’m OVERJOYED to see EM leading the way in other means of contribution to medicine. Actionable tips 👇🏾
2/ First, does it meet #scholarship criteria?

1) Original content creation

2) Advanced the field by building on theory, research or best practice

3) Was archived and disseminated

4) Community able to provide feedback in a transparent fashion that informs wider discussion.
3/ For promotions & tenure:

-- Consider obtaining letters of support, discussing the impact of specific pieces of scholarship, or simply your overall impact.

-- Include editor or peer-reviewer roles for digital scholarly content in your curriculum vitae (CV)
Read 9 tweets
"Between 2006 and 2015, ... colorectal cancer rates increased by 3.47 percent among Canadian men under age 50. And from 2010 to 2015, rates increased by 4.45 percent among women under age 50."

Let's check the data ...
1/2

nyti.ms/2Yyk9zx
Who teaches that fitting a regression line is drawing a straight line and drawing as many other straight lines as needed and wherever needed?
2/2

@f2harrell @statsepi @MaartenvSmeden #epitwitter #statstwitter #peerreviewed @JAMANetworkOpen
jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman…
I am adding a reference to the method here, which I didn't know about (and which I still don't understand why that can be applied to 45 datapoints without over fitting--maybe someone can explain).
Read 3 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!