Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #placesofworshipact
Most recents (7)
#SupremeCourt to hear petitions challenging Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act.
The 1991 Act mandates that character of all religious places of worship should be maintained as it was on August 15, 1947 and no suit or proceeding shall in this regard.
#SupremeCourtofIndia
The 1991 Act mandates that character of all religious places of worship should be maintained as it was on August 15, 1947 and no suit or proceeding shall in this regard.
#SupremeCourtofIndia
CJI DY Chandrachud: where is the counter Mr Solicitor?
SG Tushar Mehta: please fix the hearing. we will file before that
CJI: File it before February end. #placesofworshipact
SG Tushar Mehta: please fix the hearing. we will file before that
CJI: File it before February end. #placesofworshipact
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: this is an act and a legislation and you cannot have a PIL in this which challenges this law and the judgment of this court which has taken a view and how can the verdict be reviewed. This is not a dispute regarding a structure..#placesofworshipact
[Challenge to the Validity of the Places of Worship Act, 1991]
Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi submits a list of questions of law arising for consideration by the court
#placesofworshipact
#SupremeCourt
Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi submits a list of questions of law arising for consideration by the court
#placesofworshipact
#SupremeCourt
Advocate Vrinda Grover for Jamiat Ulema i Hind: The response by the Central govt is not on record. SG Mehta had sought time to file a response. After the reply we will be in a position to file a rejoinder. #placesofworshipact
#SupremeCourt
#SupremeCourt
SG Tushar Mehta: The reply is under consideration and whether to respond or not
CJI: When the challenge is to a central legislation, we will be guided by what is the stand of central government in this case. What is it now? we had granted time
SG:We need 2 weeks
#SupremeCourt
CJI: When the challenge is to a central legislation, we will be guided by what is the stand of central government in this case. What is it now? we had granted time
SG:We need 2 weeks
#SupremeCourt
Frankly, I have been sleepless since i heard detail of #WaqfLandGrab where Waqf board can CLAIM any land as theirs while as per 1991 #PlacesofWorshipAct, I can’t RECLAIM my heritage? 🤨🤨
Why did Cong kept strengthening #WaqfAct?
1954
1984
1995
Why did Cong kept strengthening #WaqfAct?
1954
1984
1995
Waqf is 3rd largest owner of land in India after Railways & Army
8 lakh acres of land
6,59,877 properties
…presently registered with Waqf Board
& all this in Hindustan, after India was partitioned by Congis on religious lines
Let that sink in 🤨🤨🤨
8 lakh acres of land
6,59,877 properties
…presently registered with Waqf Board
& all this in Hindustan, after India was partitioned by Congis on religious lines
Let that sink in 🤨🤨🤨
Nehru brought Art 370 that made Kashmiri Hindus refugees in own land
Nehru brought Hindu Code Bills in 1950s to REFORM only Hindus
SoniaG brought Communal Violence Bill 2011 holding majority community H!NDUS responsible for all R!OTS
Is this Bharat jodo or Bharat todo?
Nehru brought Hindu Code Bills in 1950s to REFORM only Hindus
SoniaG brought Communal Violence Bill 2011 holding majority community H!NDUS responsible for all R!OTS
Is this Bharat jodo or Bharat todo?
#PlacesOfWorshipAct 1991 में पास हुआ, जिसके अनुसार हिंदू अपने छीने गए मंदिरों पर दावा करके वापिस नहीं ले सकते!
उसी देश में, उसी संसद ने, उसी सत्ता ने, 1995 में #WaqfAct पास किया जिसके अनुसार #WaqfBoard/मुसलमान मस्जिद, दरगाह या कब्रिस्तान की दावे की भूमि को ही नहीं,
1/5
उसी देश में, उसी संसद ने, उसी सत्ता ने, 1995 में #WaqfAct पास किया जिसके अनुसार #WaqfBoard/मुसलमान मस्जिद, दरगाह या कब्रिस्तान की दावे की भूमि को ही नहीं,
1/5
किसी भी भूमि को अपना घोषित कर सकते हैं, इसके बाद अपील भी उन्हीं से करनी होगी, निर्णय भी उन्हीं का होगा।
उस समय देश में 80% हिंदू थे, संसद में 95% सांसद हिंदू थे, कानून मंत्रालय जो नए ऐक्ट तैयार करता है उसमें 95% प्रतिशत हिंदू थे, फिर भी ये दोनों राक्षसी कानून पास हुए।
2/5
उस समय देश में 80% हिंदू थे, संसद में 95% सांसद हिंदू थे, कानून मंत्रालय जो नए ऐक्ट तैयार करता है उसमें 95% प्रतिशत हिंदू थे, फिर भी ये दोनों राक्षसी कानून पास हुए।
2/5
हम हिंदू, वास्तविकता में जीवन से क्या चाहते क्या हैं?
What are our desires, expectations from life?
भूमि- वो मुसलमान छीन रहे हैं!
लड़कियाँ- वो मुसलमान छीन रहे हैं!
धन- वो मुसलमान हमसे ही लूट/कमा रहे हैं…..
और बचा क्या ??
3/5
What are our desires, expectations from life?
भूमि- वो मुसलमान छीन रहे हैं!
लड़कियाँ- वो मुसलमान छीन रहे हैं!
धन- वो मुसलमान हमसे ही लूट/कमा रहे हैं…..
और बचा क्या ??
3/5
"Places constructed in derogation of the personal law, cannot be termed as a 'place of worship'," another plea in #SupremeCourt has challenged the provisions of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.
The plea states, "Retrospective cutoff-date was fixed 15th August 1947 (of the Act) to legalize the illegal acts of barbaric invaders. Though, Hindu Law was ‘Law in force’ at the commencement of the Constitution."
#placesofworshipact
#placesofworshipact
PIL filed by @anilkabotra through Advocate Ashwini Kumar Dubey has challenged the constitutional validity of Section 2, 3, and 4 of the #placesofworshipact.
#BREAKING READ ORDER with story
Director Genenral of ASI to get a comprehensive physical survey done of the disputed site at Gyanvapi, Varanasi.
#kashidispute
#kashi
#gyanvapimosque
#varanasi
Director Genenral of ASI to get a comprehensive physical survey done of the disputed site at Gyanvapi, Varanasi.
#kashidispute
#kashi
#gyanvapimosque
#varanasi
#KashiGyanvapi order:
A five-member committee to be constituted comprising of eminent persons, experts well-versed with archaeology, two members preferably from minority community.
#Varanasi
#placesofworshipact
A five-member committee to be constituted comprising of eminent persons, experts well-versed with archaeology, two members preferably from minority community.
#Varanasi
#placesofworshipact
An expert to be appointed as observer for the committee
Committee prime purpose is to find whether religious structure standing at the disputed set is a superimposition, alteration or addition or if there is structural overlapping of any kind over any other religious structure
Committee prime purpose is to find whether religious structure standing at the disputed set is a superimposition, alteration or addition or if there is structural overlapping of any kind over any other religious structure
Plea in Allahabad HC seeks handover of Mathura's Shahi Masjid to Hindus as its the birthplace of Lord Krishna. Plea has also urged the court to strike down Sections 2,3, 4 of the Places of Worship Act, 1991, as unconstitutional.
#KrishnaJanmabhoomi
#PlacesofWorshipAct
#KrishnaJanmabhoomi
#PlacesofWorshipAct
The plea in the interim seeks permission for Hindus to worship at the Masjid on certain days in a week and on Janmasthmi days till the disposal of the petition.
#AllahabadHC
#AllahabadHC
Petitioner argues that the sections of the Places of Worship act, 1991, invariably and indiscriminately bans all kinds of conversions whether by agreement or by legal settlement or a judicial decision.
