Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #qualresearch
Most recents (2)
Thread on writing discussion sections for qual research in constructionist/constructivist traditions.
The idea for this comes from the responses to my previous thread () on writing up findings.
#phdchat #acwri #qualresearch #RxWritingChallenge 1/14
The idea for this comes from the responses to my previous thread () on writing up findings.
#phdchat #acwri #qualresearch #RxWritingChallenge 1/14
.@mededdoc wondered: If findings are interpreted in the eponymous section, what comes in the discussion of a qual constructionist/constructivist paper?
2/14 (hey, #WritingCommunity! this is for you too)
2/14 (hey, #WritingCommunity! this is for you too)
Let me sketch out a quick outline, in five parts.
First, discuss your findings at a very high level. What are the core things you want your reader to remember from your findings section? If you can use a table to summarize your contributions to highlight them: do!
3/14
First, discuss your findings at a very high level. What are the core things you want your reader to remember from your findings section? If you can use a table to summarize your contributions to highlight them: do!
3/14
Mini thread on writing the results section of a qual research paper. I will limit my comments to people writing within constructivist or constructionist paradigms.
1/10
#acwri #phdchat #qualresearch
1/10
#acwri #phdchat #qualresearch
First, accept that you are analyzing and interpreting the data. You are writing the piece, and therefore you should be in the paper. I prefer the first person (plural or singular, depending on whether you are writing in a team or alone, respectively).
2/10
2/10
Second, accept that your data do not speak for themselves. You are interpreting them for your reader both during data analysis and while writing. That means that you have to do three things.
3/10
3/10
