Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #sars1
Most recents (3)
Just learn few fascinating things regarding the evolution of #SARSCoV2, pathogenicity of common cold coronaviruses (CCC), and the development of a new live attenuated vaccine candidate 1/
Those who think that the #Spike protein of #SARSCoV2 has ‘exhausted’ all its options to surprise us owing to limited space to undertake infinite mutations need to rethink & revise their opinions. 2/
A comparatively old paper on human coronavirus CoV-229E hints that 25 of the 31 receptor-contacting RBD residues in HCoV-229E have varied during virus's evolution in humans over the past 50 yrs. @jbloom_lab 3/
elifesciences.org/articles/51230
elifesciences.org/articles/51230
#Cassandra: #SARS1 bound "Spikes" to Human #ACE2 receptors ONLY. Those are rare in healthy people.
In #SARS2 & #MUTANTS (#COVID19) they now bind ALSO to #Furin receptors, as in #HIV/#AIDS & #Ebola, which makes it 1000 x as #Infectuous:
— RT World News rt.com/news/481837-co…
In #SARS2 & #MUTANTS (#COVID19) they now bind ALSO to #Furin receptors, as in #HIV/#AIDS & #Ebola, which makes it 1000 x as #Infectuous:
— RT World News rt.com/news/481837-co…
#Cassandra: January 2020 article:
Uncanny similarity of 4 unique #Inserts in the 2019-nCoV (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein to #HIV1 (AIDS) #Gp120 and #Gag:
->biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Uncanny similarity of 4 unique #Inserts in the 2019-nCoV (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein to #HIV1 (AIDS) #Gp120 and #Gag:
->biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
#Cassandra: Article March 2020.
#SARS_CoV_2 (COVID19) is NOT Natural !
#Czech molecular biologist, Dr. Soňa Peková explains in layman terms that #COVID19 virus originates from a lab, and the Americans try to refute it (Updated):
dimsumdaily.hk/czech-molecula… via @dimsum Daily
#SARS_CoV_2 (COVID19) is NOT Natural !
#Czech molecular biologist, Dr. Soňa Peková explains in layman terms that #COVID19 virus originates from a lab, and the Americans try to refute it (Updated):
dimsumdaily.hk/czech-molecula… via @dimsum Daily
#Crisanti: «Chi parla (come #Remuzzi) dell’ infettività di questo virus non sa quello che dice, perché l’infettività si misura sperimentalmente, e sull’uomo non è possibile fare nessun esperimento,non esiste modello animale. Senza numeri e misura non è scienza, ma chiacchiere."
#Cristanti: "Siccome non è possibile fare sperimentazioni di infettività sull’uomo, nessuno sa qual è la dose infettiva del virus = non c’è nulla da commentare: non si può commentare con un argomento scientifico una cosa che non è Scienza». Asfaltato #Remuzzi.
A un certo momento escono fuori le persone di 2. e 3. piano, quelli che sul campo specifico (virologia e epidemiologia) non hanno un nome nella "scientific comunity" che fa ricerca e pubblica (peer reviewed) ma si vogliono anche ritagliare un po' di attenzione pubblica, poverini.
