Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #shampeachment
Most recents (7)
Dr. Rick Bright, a full of shit deep-stater (and former advisor to @WHO), was removed as director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority thehill.com/policy/healthc…
“I believe this transfer was in response to my insistence that the government invest the billions of dollars allocated by Congress to address the Covid-19 pandemic into safe and scientifically vetted solutions...
... and not in drugs, vaccines and other technologies that ‘lack scientific merit’,” he said.
Bright said he "resisted efforts to fund potentially dangerous drugs promoted by those with political connections."
Bright said he "resisted efforts to fund potentially dangerous drugs promoted by those with political connections."
Petulant Democrat #shampeachment ‘witness,’ Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, unloads on @MarshaBlackburn as Dems wrap 3rd day of Trump's trial
foxnews.com/politics/trump…
foxnews.com/politics/trump…
Blackburn doubled down in an interview Thursday night, saying that she has spoken to many members of the military who have a "problem" with the way the fragile Vindman circumented the chain of command to try to undermine Trump's foreign policy. 
The NSC’s Tim Morrison also previously testified that Vindman had given him edits of the transcript of the call, on the same day that Vindman testified that Morrison was unreachable.
Good morning to you all. We shall have fun watching ignoramuses celebrate their Pyrrhic victory, as they dance their way to the 2020 electoral slaughterhouse. I guess the Christian thing to do would be to feel sad for them, for they know not what they do. Merry Christmas!
It takes a Brit from across the pond, Piers Morgan, to see what's happening to Democrats more clearly.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7…
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7…
1. Trump's Appeal Revealed
Most people on the left and right would agree that Trump will be very hard to beat in 2020. Why is that? With negative coverage from MSM all day long, why is Trump still so formidable politically? What is his appeal? I see cognoscenti struggling.
Most people on the left and right would agree that Trump will be very hard to beat in 2020. Why is that? With negative coverage from MSM all day long, why is Trump still so formidable politically? What is his appeal? I see cognoscenti struggling.
2. Democrats and MSM have convinced themselves that Trump supporters are irrational and beyond reason, while refusing to admit, even to themselves, that Trump can never win on the strength of his hard-core supporters alone. So what about the others. Why would so many favor Trump?
3. The truth is so obvious that ideological zealots, whose entire worldview is based on ideology and who cannot recognize anything else even if it bites them in the ass, just don't see what's right in front of their eyes. And that is simply this: Results!
1. (New Prosecutor) Ryaboshapka said (Ukrainian) Zlochevsky was now suspected of the “theft of government funds on an especially large scale...”
reuters.com/article/us-usa…
reuters.com/article/us-usa…
2. Zlochevsky is Burisma's founder. Hunter Biden "joined the board ... at a time when Burisma was engulfed in corruption investigation woes, and at a time when his father Joe Biden as vice president was in charge of anti-Ukrainian corruption policy... foxnews.com/politics/buris…
3. According to Reuters, Hunter Biden “regularly attended” Burisma’s twice-yearly board meetings, which took place outside of Ukraine. realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/…
Democrats on the House Rules committee are about to defeat a Republican amendment to allow the President's counsel to participate in ALL relevant impeachment inquiry hearings, not just Judiciary at the end bit.ly/322Zd5k via @BreitbartNews
@BreitbartNews Their response to Republican objections is to claim that the House majority has power to do whatever they want, therefore complaints about fairness and due process rights really don't matter, so suck it up, America
@BreitbartNews Democrats are also trying to claim due process does not apply in the House, which they liken to a "grand jury" (there is some basis for that). The Republicans point out, correctly, that a) impeachment is not ordinary crime; b) if it's like a grand jury, why are Democrats leaking?
Quid Pro Quo
Let us put this wordplay nonsense to rest. There is nothing wrong ipso facto with 'quid pro quo.' The whole effing life, let alone every facet of foreign policy, is based on quid pro quo. What makes it right or wrong is always the nature and content of quid and quo.
Let us put this wordplay nonsense to rest. There is nothing wrong ipso facto with 'quid pro quo.' The whole effing life, let alone every facet of foreign policy, is based on quid pro quo. What makes it right or wrong is always the nature and content of quid and quo.
If President Trump asked Ukraine to 'supply dirt on Biden' a la Steele dossier, that would be an impeachable offense. But if President Trump asked for help with our investigation of 2016 election interference and any govt malfeasance, that's commendable prioritization and focus.
The #Shampeachment Scam
Here's a detailed explanation of why Dems and Media are desperate to make 'Quid Pro Quo' a bad thing and why it is such a terrible, misguided, and self-serving idea which does the nation great harm, and public a great disservice.
thehill.com/opinion/white-…
Here's a detailed explanation of why Dems and Media are desperate to make 'Quid Pro Quo' a bad thing and why it is such a terrible, misguided, and self-serving idea which does the nation great harm, and public a great disservice.
thehill.com/opinion/white-…
