Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #thebbc
Most recents (6)
#DavidAaronovitch & the media outlets he works for, which includes #TheBBC & @thetimes, have an AGENDA, which they never talk about, at least, not publicly, & I'm pretty sure that if one broached the issue with any of them they would deny it.
Maybe they are not consciously aware of it themselves. I have no way of knowing. Most of what motivates us lies in the subconscious, which censors what it allows to become conscious.
This agenda is the ideology of post-racial multiculturalism, DIVERSITY, Inclusion & #AntiRacism.
This agenda is the ideology of post-racial multiculturalism, DIVERSITY, Inclusion & #AntiRacism.
It's an ideology that arose in misconceived, #NeverAgain, response to the evils of Nazi ideology of racial purity & supremacy, which it goes to the opposite but equally insane extremes of. It's a self-destructive ideology of White racial self-denial, self-contempt & self-hatred.
The British state & establishment, incl. civil service, #TheBBC & Parliament, are all beholden to the Orwellian & moral-supremacist ideology of Post-Racial #Multiculturalism, DIVERSITY, Inclusion & #AntiRacism, which goes to the opposite & equally insane extremes of Nazism.
That this ideology goes to the opposite extremes of Nazi ideology of #RacialPurity & supremacy is no coincidence, but forms the basis of its claim to moral authority & thus POWER. Anyone opposing it is cancelled as a neo-Nazi, fascist, bigot, xenophobe or RACIST.
This is why a large, rational & democratic majority has been powerless to prevent the madness of mass immigration into our already overpopulated country, & its demographic transformation. All opposition was, & continues to be, demonised as RACIST.
The murder of #DavidAmess MP has been officially declared a "terrorist act", but what does that mean?
Was it also a "racist act"?
When a White man kills a non-White it's always "racist" (e.g. #GeorgeFloyd), but when a non-White kills a White person, it never is.
Why is this?
Was it also a "racist act"?
When a White man kills a non-White it's always "racist" (e.g. #GeorgeFloyd), but when a non-White kills a White person, it never is.
Why is this?
It is because Britain, America & most other Western "democracies" embraced an ideology of White racial self-denial & self-contempt, in a pathologically misguided, #NeverAgain, response to the evils of Nazism, the Nazis having all been White.
How can citizens of a democracy be persuaded to embrace an ideology of racial self-denial & self-contempt?
First, by not being a true democracy, but an Orwellian construct of lies & deceit, supported by a regime of rewards & intimidation.
First, by not being a true democracy, but an Orwellian construct of lies & deceit, supported by a regime of rewards & intimidation.
#DavidAaronovitch, an eminent British journalist & #OrwellPrize winner, who works for @thetimes, #TheBBC & @IndexCensorship informed the TwitterSphere some while back that I am a RACIST.
This is something I want the world to know, because it's important.
This is something I want the world to know, because it's important.
Anyone who has ever been called a RACIST knows the severity of this accusation & the devastating consequences it can have, which are on a par with being called a fascist, a Nazi or a paedophile. It is intimidating in the extreme.
I don't doubt David's sincerity in believing me to be a RACIST, as do some others I have discussed the issue of Race with, but nor do I doubt that they are mistaken. I know myself far better than they do, & that I'm not a RACIST. At least, not in the damning sense implied.
I tweeted this almost a year ago & had since forgotten about it, but is worth retweeting, since it goes to the heart of what is rotten, not just in the state of Denmark, but in ALL states.
It is by demonising, manipulating & exploiting human tribalism that society's elites rule.
It is by demonising, manipulating & exploiting human tribalism that society's elites rule.
Why do the academics we look to as authorities on understanding society, the state & civilisation fail to recognise this?
Academics are privileged clients and employees of the state. That’s why.
It is of existential importance that academics themselves recognise this.
Academics are privileged clients and employees of the state. That’s why.
It is of existential importance that academics themselves recognise this.
Who are these elites?
First & foremost, academics & those who passed through their hands at university & now have high-status & influential positions in society. To name just one of countless examples: #DavidAaronovitch, an eminent journalist who works for @thetimes & #TheBBC.
First & foremost, academics & those who passed through their hands at university & now have high-status & influential positions in society. To name just one of countless examples: #DavidAaronovitch, an eminent journalist who works for @thetimes & #TheBBC.
The eminent British journalist & #OrwellPrize winner, #DavidAaronovitch, who works for @thetimes & #TheBBC, i.e is very much a member of the British establishment, believes that any White person who identifies with & cares more for their own race than for other races is a RACIST.
There is nothing I would like more than to discuss this issue with @DAaronovitch himself, but he refuses to engage with me, simply dismissing me as a RACIST.
If this were just between me & David it would be unimportant, but it is a huge & existential socio-political issue.
If this were just between me & David it would be unimportant, but it is a huge & existential socio-political issue.
Apart from his very closest kin, David despises kinship & thus any sense of racial identity, which, together with the British establishment, he believes to be morally deplorable. It's an attitude which goes to the opposite but equally insane extremes of Nazi racial ideology.
