Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #watkins
Most recents (2)
Ah #Alisson won’t want to see this again!
There’s 2 mistakes here:
1. Positioning: he’s 6yrd out for a central 15yrd shot thus he cuts his reaction time greatly without reducing the effective goal area a lot.
2. Technique: he goes with his hand rather than his foot!
#LIVAVL
There’s 2 mistakes here:
1. Positioning: he’s 6yrd out for a central 15yrd shot thus he cuts his reaction time greatly without reducing the effective goal area a lot.
2. Technique: he goes with his hand rather than his foot!
#LIVAVL
Research has shown the optimum GK position for none 1v1 long range shots is roughly 1.5-2yrd off the line
Once a GK starts positioning themselves further out than this the reduced goal area they have to cover doesn’t outweigh the loss of reaction time hence goals like this occur
Once a GK starts positioning themselves further out than this the reduced goal area they have to cover doesn’t outweigh the loss of reaction time hence goals like this occur
In this situation though #Watkins’ finish is actually a poor one as he smashes it down the centre, so #Alisson could’ve got away with his poor positioning but he compounded his first mistake by going with his hand rather than his foot!
#PremierLeague #LIVAVL
#PremierLeague #LIVAVL
L'info #breaking de la nuit US. Le président #Trump et ses enfants attaquent devant le tribunal fédéral de Manhattan les banques Deutsche Bank et Capital One pour les empêcher de répondre aux assignations de la Chambre démocrate sur leurs états financiers. fr.scribd.com/document/40811…
2) La plainte des #Trump est très intéressante en ce qu'elle s'appuie juridiquement sur la remise en cause du pouvoir d'enquête du Congrès que le président et ses enfants estiment ici sans motif législatif, donc infondé. La guerre aux contre-pouvoirs est bien déclarée.
3) Toute l'argumentation de #Trump tourne autour de l'arrêt Watkins de 1957 de la #CourSuprême qui a établi que le Congrès a des pouvoirs d'enquête larges MAIS pas infinis, ET qu'il doit justifier la publication de données privées par 1 motif "légitime". supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/…
