Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #zeroscience
Most recents (1)
Let's do some maths on masks claimed efficiency
We all have seen those mask Vs no mask crazy graphs. Some categorised risk (extreme...), others have guts enough to give percentages
In all of them, no mask/no mask contact means SURE infection.
Even both masked remains 1.5% risk
We all have seen those mask Vs no mask crazy graphs. Some categorised risk (extreme...), others have guts enough to give percentages
In all of them, no mask/no mask contact means SURE infection.
Even both masked remains 1.5% risk
Infected unmasked Vs masked is valued at 70% risky.
So 7 out of every 10 close interactions end in INFECTION.
We're checking this numbers for pre restrictions era, nobody masked. Not wanting to abuse with a 95%, we're using that 70% chance for all unmasked interactions.
So 7 out of every 10 close interactions end in INFECTION.
We're checking this numbers for pre restrictions era, nobody masked. Not wanting to abuse with a 95%, we're using that 70% chance for all unmasked interactions.
Now, let's understand some on 'interactions'. For contact tracing there's the standard ( I love all those minute/feet/exact number vivid paraphernalia: so sassy!) of 15 min contact.
Let's guess a minimum of 5 of those interactions with a day, with different people.
Let's guess a minimum of 5 of those interactions with a day, with different people.
