Thread by @usacsmret

Fact-checking @realDonaldTrump, @HillaryClinton, @Google, and @DrREpstine on search results and 2016 voting. dailysign.al/2P2Qsa9 via @FredLucasWH @DailySignal

@realDonaldTrump @HillaryClinton @Google @FredLucasWH @DailySignal Epstein: “This system must be built to keep an eye on Big Tech in 2020, because if these companies all support the same candidate—and that’s likely...they will be able to shift upwards of 15 million votes to that candidate with no one knowing and without leaving a paper trail.”

@realDonaldTrump @HillaryClinton @Google @FredLucasWH @DailySignal “The 2.6 million is a rock-bottom minimum. The range is between 2.6 [million] and 10.4 million votes, depending on how aggressive they were in using the techniques that I’ve been studying, ....

@realDonaldTrump @HillaryClinton @Google @FredLucasWH @DailySignal ...They control these, and no one can counteract them. These are not competitive. These are tools that they have at their disposal exclusively.” Epstein added

@realDonaldTrump @HillaryClinton @Google @FredLucasWH @DailySignal Epstein said. “The 2016 monitoring system allowed my team to successfully preserve 13,207 election-related search results, along with the 98,044 web pages to which the search results linked.”

@realDonaldTrump @HillaryClinton @Google @FredLucasWH @DailySignal Epstein noted that Clinton’s largest corporate donor in 2016 was Alphabet Inc., the parent company of Google. Meanwhile, Google chief Eric Schmidt offered to run her tech campaign.

@realDonaldTrump @HillaryClinton @Google @FredLucasWH @DailySignal “Schmidt in fact funded the Groundwork, a highly secretive tech company, the sole purpose of which was to put Clinton into office,” Epstein said.

@realDonaldTrump @HillaryClinton @Google @FredLucasWH @DailySignal I found significant pro-Hillary bias on Google.com, but not on Bing or Yahoo, and the pro-Hillary bias was present in all [10] search positions on the first page of Google search results.

@realDonaldTrump @HillaryClinton @Google @FredLucasWH @DailySignal “These effects are nothing like Russian-placed ads or fake news stories. Russian interference, although troubling and unacceptable, does not, in my opinion, shift many votes,” Epstein said in the testimony.

@realDonaldTrump @HillaryClinton @Google @FredLucasWH @DailySignal “Ads and news stories are competitive and visible, like billboards. The kinds of ephemeral effects I am studying, however, are invisible and noncompetitive. “They are controlled entirely by big tech companies, and there is no way to counteract them,” he said.