Thread by @sankrant

Hitler is a product of #ChristoIslam—all totalitarianism is. He was simply a good choir boy. His targeting of Jews simply built on pogroms Catholic Popes had done earlier. His "Yellow badges" for Jews came from Islamic Caliphs treatment of minorities.

encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/art…

The polemics against BJP/RSS as "fascist/Hitler" are simply that, deranged polemics. They are based on 1 or 2 quotes from World War II times, a time when SC Bose, actually met with Hitler. An enemy of the enemy (the British) was considered a friend. The polemics have no basis.

Unlike those who self-identify as communists, "fascist" is a term of abuse, not a self-description. It can't be taken seriously.

Communists, on the other hand, self-identify as the inheritors of the legacy of mass-murderers Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot.

baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-19…

Fascism and communism are European ideologies, born of totalitarian religion. They are only meaningful in other cultures when people themselves claim to follow these ideologies. Even so, Communists have murdered many more than European fascists ever did.

wsj.com/articles/100-y…

So there is hard to imagine a bigger term of ideological abuse than calling oneself as "communist"—an inheritor of a legacy of genocide a likely genocidal maniac with the slightest bit of power. Even in India, communists are by far the biggest killers.

In cruelty they are matched only by their Islamist brethren. Communists in India have been known to kill a child and make the mother eat it, much like #ISIS. The ideology makes one immune to moral reasoning or conscience. Tag commies on this thread.

Communism borrows from its religious forebears in its totalitarianism—you must believe or you'll go to commie-bourgeois hell. Anyone standing in the way of their utopian fantasy of "revolution" will be attacked. Never mind it always ends in dystopia.

Thus European ideologies of Nazism, fascism and communism are siblings birthed by European religious thought (which spawns “rationalism” as well). Their rivalry is sibling rivalry. Their totalitarianism arises in a culture of exclusive monotheism.

Collaboration of Hitler and Islamists is an under-reported saga. In fact there are close ideological parallels, cemented by their common hatred for Jews.

It’s laughable when Indian “seculars” and Islamists label Hindus, who protected Jews, as “Hitler.”

Nazis and Hitler were Christian. Their closest collaborators were Islamists. Hitler's Nazi party was the "National Socialist Party."

These three ideologies Socialism/Communism, Christianity and Islam now target Hindus with the Nazi slur.

jpost.com/Middle-East/Sa…

So much spin on how Hitler was not Christian. 1. Hitler was raised Christian 2. Pogroms against Jews were common to Christians—Hitler just had the "final solution" 3. Nowhere did Hitler renounce Christianity, though he may have criticized, as insiders do.

Most of the Nazis were Church-going Christians. They would go to Sunday Church and come back and order massacres of Jews and Roma "gypsies."

Hitler never adopted "Swastika." He never uses that word. The Christian "hooked cross" was translated as Swastika by the English pastor who translated Hitler into English. Typical Christian spin, to avoid how deeply the Nazis embodied Christian values.