Thread by @BjornLomborg

New York Times and Stiglitz claim report show “moderate” economic cost of ambitious climate target

False. No such estimate in report

(Ironically, just like there is no Nordhaus economic cost estimate.)

One of many #FalseClaimsToPreserveAlarmism

linkedin.com/pulse/new-york…

Or see how they belittle: Nordhaus didn’t just “come up with” or “seems to think”

It is Nobel Prize awarded climate economic research

@nytimes @JosephEStiglitz #FalseClaimsToPreserveTheAlarmism
linkedin.com/pulse/new-york…

See previous false statements:

Here is the description of the stunningly long list of false and deceptive claims from New York Times review of my book

Of its 12 central, critical claims, 12 are false

Deplorable fact-checking

#FalseClaimsToPreserveAlarmism

New York Times & Stiglitz don't want to see their alarmism debunked:

Don’t read his book with the economic evidence! It is ”dangerous”

Don't look at the data! It is "mind-pollution”

Well, fortunately, you can read for yourself: hachettebookgroup.com/wp-content/upl…