.@LindseyGrahamSC, .@DevinNunes please compare FBI Lawyer Trisha Anderson’s testimony to the House on the Carter Page FISA process to the testimony Sally Yates gave yesterday before the Senate. You may have a criminal referral for Perjury to send out.
Ms. Anderson: “There were individuals, all the way up to the Deputy Director and the Deputy Attorney General on the DOJ side, who had essentially given their approval to the FISA before it got to that step in the process. That part of it was unusual, and so I didn’t...
consider my review at that point in the process to be substantive in nature.”
Compared to Yates testimony yesterday in which she states that she only approved after the information came up through the FBI.
Why did Yates say yesterday she followed the normal process of FISA approval for the DAG when Trisha Anderson said the applications were essentially pre approved by McCabe and Yates first, causing Anderson to not apply as much scrutiny?
Overall I thought you did a great job yesterday .@LindseyGrahamSC but please bring up Anderson’s testimony when you interview Mr. McCabe.
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.