The first official #agingdoc1 poll. Background: I serve, in order (1) Researchers (2) MDs/DOs & other providers (3) Investors (4) Top >1% of health-educated non-professional public. Each w/ their own unique interest & educational level (tricky!). How am I doing? For YOUR purpose:
Previous feedback has led to fewer abbreviations (keeping them densely for scientist-geared material, but substantially cut back the rest),⬆️disambiguation & ⬆️explanations & discussion of sources.
What else would you suggest? Please comment below, I take all feedback seriously
This is me: The robot from the original Short Circuit movie "Need more input!" - Thanks!😃
Thank you for the feedback. I was surprised by the results and was considering cutting back posts as not to overwhelm. Based on these results I will maintain volume adhering to high standards.
So far the niche is “eclectic” rather than serving one narrow group —> post diversity
By expanding scope & diversity, the incremental value of “following” @agingdoc1 is ⬆️ as the probability of unique content ⬆️ vs. other research/lab focused sources
The selection reflects my unique knowledge, skills & interest in geroscience, & living healthier longer & happier.
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.