Thread by @rising_serpent

Susan Rosenberg sits on the Board of BLM. She was convicted for1983 bombing of US Capitol Building, the U.S. Naval War College and NY PBA. She was released after serving 16 of her 58-year sentence when Bill Clinton commuted it on his last day in office.
snopes.com/fact-check/blm…

BLM is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt, left-wing, Marxist-leaning organization created by three woman. Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors and Opel Tomet.
Cullors compared Trump to Hitler, saying he “is literally the epitome of evil, all the evils of this country”

BLM is sponsored financially by the leftist group Thousand Currents, whose board of directors includes convicted terrorist, Susan Rosenberg, who was active in the May 19th Communist Organization, which FBI stated “openly advocates overthrow of U.S. Government through violence.”

On June 8 Managing director for the Black Lives Matter organization— Kailee Scales — conducted a disastrous Reddit AMA, during which she was hard pressed to disclose where and how exactly the money received from donations to BLM was being used.

She refused to answer those questions, and the ensuing controversy was enough for moderators to lock the thread.
However this galvanized internet sleuths into action.
One Reddit user pointed out Black Lives Matter uses ActBlue as their electronic platform for donations.

ActBlue is a nonprofit technology organization established in June 2004 that enables Democrats, progressive groups, and nonprofits to raise money on the Internet by providing them with online fundraising software.
Nothing suspicious about that, so far.

However, like pretty much everything else, the devil is in the details, literally.
Upon reading the fine print of ActBlue’s policy, many interesting details begin to emerge:

"In the event that a campaign or committee (a) fails for 60 days to cash a check from ActBlue which includes your contribution (after ActBlue makes repeated attempts to work with the campaign to ensure all checks are cashed), or

(b) affirmatively refuses a contribution earmarked through ActBlue, your contribution will be re-designated as a contribution to ActBlue."

"Contributions to social welfare organizations which are similarly not cashed or are affirmatively refused will be kept by ActBlue and used generally to support its social welfare activities"

What this means in plain English is that
all ActBlue they has to do is let the 60-day period elapse, and those donations would be free for them to release and handle as they see fit. The money could end up in the coffers of Democrat and Progressive campaigns.

Considering that the total amount of money that BLM has received to date is in the hundreds of millions, (if not more) it makes ActBlue a formidable fundraising Leviathan with absolutely no other contemporary peer.

What is even more fascinating is that right up to BLM's fundraising going nuclear in the wake of the George Floyd death Democrat fundraising was lackluster and significantly trailing that of Donald Trump.

Another data point that lends credence the ActBlue as a money laundering front hypothesis is the recent revelation that almost 50% donations to ActBlue came from untraceable and unemployed donors.
foxnews.com/politics/exclu…

More than 4.7 million donations came from people who claimed they did not have an employer. Those 4.7 million donations totaled $346 million ActBlue raised and sent to liberal causes.

An examination of 2020 data from January through August showed an uptick in "unemployed" donations through ActBlue, to 50.1% this year.

So 50% of all donations to ActBlue came from individuals who are not employed and therefore don't need to disclose the name of their employers as mandated by law.
How convenient is that?
Let that sink in.

But wait, there's more.
A major portion of this data haul was from 2019.
At a time when the unemployment rate was under 4% a full 50% off all donations to act blue came from unemployed individuals?
That's should strain the credulity of even the most terminally gullible Democrat.

For comparison, last year the Republican Party created a competing fundraising platform called WinRed to counter ActBlue's prowess in small-donor sourcing.

An analysis of WinRed's 4.9 million donations totalling $302 million found that only 4% came from people who did not list an employer or were unemployed. This year, the rate is 5.6%, according to the data.

Both WinRed and ActBlue note on their donation pages that law requires donors to list their employer and occupation.
However, here is where things get very interesting.

ActBlue does not allow banks to verify the identity of the cardholder, meaning someone could buy endless gift cards and list any name they wanted and leave the employer line blank or type in words like 'not employed,' 'unemployed.'"
foxnews.com/politics/exclu…

When you look at a side-by-side, year by year comparison, in 2019 a little over 47% of all donations to ActBlue came from unemployed donors.
The unemployment rate was under 4%.
This year that number is up to 50%

The odds that at record low unemployment rates the Democratic party received disproportionately high donations from unemployed individuals, who continued to give them even more money after the unemployment tripled in the span of a year is practically zero.

Both BLM by its very birth and ActBlue by design employ hazy opaqueness in their modus operandi and act in fairly complementary ways.
One is an openly Marxist organization tasked with the destruction of traditional family structure and an overthrow of western civilization.

The other is a fundraising environment convoluted to the extreme and skilled at obscuring the origins of its funding.
Indeed, all evidence points to it being a money laundering front for for dark money, especially from foreign actors.

Record fundraising halls can surely be organic, but if they are, there would be absolutely no reason to obscure them. A more logical explanation is that foreign money is now front and center in Democrat politics because this election is their fight for survival.

Viewed from a higher vantage point of perspective, the events of the last 6 months are in essence a socialism trial period.
Uncontrolled chaos, violence, government mandated lockdowns and curfews, empty food shelves and pantries, sure sounds like socialism, doesn't it.

This was never about race. It has always been about control. Absolute control. Over every aspect of our lives. Or in other words Marxism.
And overthrow takes money, unusual violence, requires many lives lost & a complete erosion of trust.
And we are almost there.
Wake up.
-Fin