The Honest Broker Profile picture
undisciplined scholar, recovering academic | @AEI | @DNVA1 | @UCL | @CUBoulder | @TheDispatch | The Honest Broker Substack ➡️ https://t.co/f7iRjp3abk

Sep 15, 2020, 8 tweets

🧵I’m referenced in this @WSJopinion editorial today

That is great because it gives me a chance to write this thread about scientific integrity, Trump & Biden

Joe Biden gives a speech on wildfires and never mentions better forest management. wsj.com/articles/biden… via @WSJ

The @WSJopinion accurately cites my (& colleagues) research, @NOAA & the @IPCC_CH

That said, the Editorial Board posits a false equivalence between the delegitimizing words & deeds of Trump and the exaggerated hyperbole of Biden

They are not equivalent

Describing Trump administration as “anti-science” does Trump a favor — it is much, much worse

Trump & appointees are in fact “anti-competency” in complete fealty to autocracy

We see this with @NOAA @CDCgov @US_FDA @fema to name just a few

This is about governance not science

If we get sucked into a “forest management” vs “climate change” framing Trump has already won the propaganda battle

Winning this debate (whatever that means) does not restore trust, legitimacy, competency or work against autocracy

It gets RTs & excites people

But don’t do it

I have no doubt that Biden & a future Biden administration will depart from Trumpian autocratic governance

That won’t be about mouthing appropriate words about “the science” but securing respect for expertise in federal agencies among elected & appointed figures and the public

The idea that Trump’s delegitimization of federal agencies & their expertise = Biden’s exaggeration of climate change is the false equivalency

They are not remotely comparable

Which is why I question Biden’s appeals to “the science” rather than going straight to competency

Of course Biden should play things straight on climate change — it is both tactically smart & the right thing to do

But more importantly, he should avoid getting trapped in a “forest management” vs “climate change” debate that feeds red meat to partisans but little else

Bottom line:

Central issue here is competency in governance — getting stuff done, like protecting people from hazards, responding to the pandemic, decarbonizing the economy

Pretending this is about “the science” gives Trump an easy win

It is about competency & autocracy
🙏

Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.

A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.

Keep scrolling