No, let's definitely criticize her for wanting to establish a "Kingdom of God" in what was originally established as a secular nation. Dominionism is trash and we can say it's trash.
"No don't criticize the potential SCOTUS candidate for turning marginalized people's rights into a religious issue so she can justify stripping them away. That would be wrong."
So now we've gone from separation of the Church and State being a thing to "If you oppose a complete Christian theocracy you're the antichrist."
Lean into it I guess.
Dominionism. texasobserver.org/dominion-theol…
My ~hateful ideology~ is to provide health care for everyone, to make sure everyone is housed and has food, to make sure members of marginalized groups whether race, religion, sexual orientation, gender, or gender identity are not discriminated against.
This is what they think of people who oppose the government being based on Old Testament law.
Ableist too.
Religious freedom is when a SCOTUS justice has that position specifically in order to turn the US into the "Kingdom of God." Religious freedom to religiously oppress everyone else. 🙃
Religious freedom means turning the US into a theocracy is bad, actually.
She explicitly says the purpose of her career as a judge is to work toward creating a "Kingdom of God." All these angry dominionists in my replies won't acknowledge that, or acknowledge how this defies their vaunted "religious freedom."
And also
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.