Thread by @2youngBadazz

elon truther threads:

overview of fraudulent spacex/tesla narrative

spacex origins

'tesla death ray' joke

short summing up: im reviewing the history of the internet and the technologies that enable it (satcom, networked computers, sensors) and depend on it (uav), roughly divided into pre and post 9/11 eras. overlapping w/ this are space psyops that have been used to give cover to

these developments, such as apollo, sdi, and spacex. the apollo era roughly marks the beginning of the 'internet plan' according to the mythology *of the ruling class*. see lickliders igcn. i believe sdi anticipated the necessity for a heavily militarized satellite layer to

achieve global coverage. sdi gave way to the 'early consumer internet period' of 91 until bubble burst, which included plans for leo constellations (see teledesic etc) that were put on hold. bubble burst lead to 9/11 and militarization/consolidation of internet infrastructure

since 9/11 there has been massive focus on uav warfare which need more bandwidth less latency from sats. this was known since 90s. spacex founded 02. in 2020, spacex's leo sat constellation which 'solves' bandwidth latency problem coming online.

'why put LEO internet on hold' is a question i will return to later. satellite control of uav is only part of equation. also since 9/11 is unprecedented proliferation of sensors and data gathering, they did 9/11 because this infrastructure was ready. 3g, the fiber glut,

mothballed data centers, it was all ready to start sensing and storing and processing that data. by 06 or so all the infrastructure from bubble era was back online and more was needed. the rise of google, smartphones (why 3g was built), etc. the internet isnt *just* a

counterinsurgency weapon although the data gathering/processing and prediction does serve that purpose. it also is informing how to solve the next problem. ussr gone, shift from nuclear war to global counterinsurgency. when global counterinsurgency is stably achieved, the next

step is to get rid of all of the useless people made unnecessary by automation who pose a risk to ruling class. the internet not only informs the shape that plan should take but it also allows the current population to train the technologies that will be required after were gone

in other words the current population can be used to massively increase the amount of data generated which will then be used to solve problems that will be harder to solve with the decrease of generated data once it is reduced. this is part of what we've all been doing since 9/11

we are still in the phase of building out the surveillance part of global counterinsurgency machine, which requires the LEO constellations for global internet. the kinetic element of the machine, best represented *for now* by uav, is still being refined and is nowhere near done

while global internet could *support* a kinetic element, i think its very obvious this is nowhere near in place. the earlier parts of the kill chain, identifying and locating targets, are much further developed. if 9/11 was *largely* about building the targeting system,

the 'pandemic' era may push towards a kinetic system that can match the granularity of the targeting system. for all of the farce of gwot 'deradicalization' efforts, worth mentioning that in the 9/11 era internet-enabled nonlethal deterrents of all kinds of dissidence and social

cohesion have actually been extremely successful but there is still immense risk to the ruling class and many ways they could lose even with everything that they have already built. especially considering the limitations of their current uav capabilities

again, this shows the high degree of premeditation and planning across major industries in the 1990s to lay the groundwork for the rise of global internet in the 2000s. web 2.0, 3g, an explosion in bandwidth and traffic until today.

its worth the redundancy to emphasize that the internet is a military technology and the proliferation of internet usage serves military purposes, because this is also very relevant for other technologies being developed now such as cars guided by computer vision:

a brief segue:

here we see the same central versus edge computing dynamic playing a role in the SDI