Health Nerd Profile picture
https://t.co/hkLzdpoOQd Epidemiologist. Writer (Slate, TIME, etc). ' Research fellow at @UoW Host of @senscipod Email gidmk.healthnerd@gmail.com he/him

Jun 8, 2021, 14 tweets

Headlines: vegetarian diets prevent severe COVID!

Study: cross-sectional survey-based investigation of an online sample of healthcare workers shows some interesting associations

The headlines are wildly silly 1/n

2/n The study is here, and fun for a quick read. Basically, a group of researchers surveyed healthcare workers in July-Sept 2020 and asked them stuff about their diet and COVID nutrition.bmj.com/content/early/…

3/n This appears to be the 3rd or 4th study published from that survey. The authors basically found that, after controlling for a couple of confounders, there was an association between self-reported diet and risk of severe COVID-19

3.5/n (As a minor bugbear, the authors report this as a case-control study but that's not true because they didn't identify their participants based on COVID-19 status they just recruited healthcare workers to do their survey so it should be called a cross-sectional cohort)

4/n Anyway, regardless of the study type, it definitely doesn't support the headlines

Firstly, there's the population. This study was almost exclusively comprised of middle-aged, white doctors

5/n We can quibble about generalizability, but as a general rule if ~80% of your population is a single very specific demographic, it's hard to say much about populations based on that sample

6/n Secondly, there's the issue with unmeasured confounding. The study only asked people about a small number of covariates, but there are ~dozens~ of potentially important things that this could've missed

7/n Ignoring the obvious things like income, we might be worried that level of exposure to COVID-19 cases could cause people to have a higher risk of COVID-19, but that information wasn't included in the model

8/n There's also some indications in the study itself that the survey data (collected online) might not be very good as well

For example, of the 568 people who report having COVID-19, 33% say that they had a NEGATIVE COVID-19 test

8.5/n This may have been because the definition of a COVID-19 'case' used in the study is very broad. It appears that anyone with any symptoms consistent with COVID-19 would be a case here, regardless of testing

9/n When the researchers excluded these PCR-negative cases from their model, the statistically significant association between vegetarian diets largely disappeared 👀👀👀

10/n Anyway, the headlines saying that vegetarian diets reduce the risk of severe COVID-19 are rather ridiculous. This study just can't prove that

11/n A better headline might be "middle-aged white doctors who report eating vegetarian diets at slightly reduced risk of reporting COVID-19 symptoms, study suggests"

Not quite as impressive, perhaps, but a bit more accurate

12/n Oh, also, forgot to mention that the headline "73%" reduced risk is a relative risk, if you calculate the absolute risk difference for severe COVID-19 between the vegetarians and everyone else it works out to be about 4% so there's that too

Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.

A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.

Keep scrolling