A very interesting interview with Peter Embarek for TV2 in Denmark.
translate.google.com/translate?sl=a…
Until 48 hours before we finished the whole mission, we still had no agreement that we would talk about the laboratory part of the report, so it was right up to the end that it was discussed whether it should be included or not, says Peter Embarek.
We did not get to look at laboratory books or documents directly from the laboratory. We got a presentation, and then we talked about and asked the questions we wanted to ask, but we did not get to look at any documentation at all, says Peter Embarek.
"Extremely unlikely" was a compromise
Great mate. Thanks for that!
He himself has thought about why the laboratory theory met so much resistance...
A completely different type of study is needed to move forward on the research related hypothesis:
For info, here is part of a brief but good exchange I had with one of the WHO team members just before the end of of their mission in Wuhan (9th Feb 21), about the importance of keeping the research-related scenarios on the table and the way to explore them.
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.