Thread by @jsm2334

When you are senior editor of a journal and handle your own paper, it is not peer review, it is an editorial:

I’ve now read the paper in detail

It is a science based commentary projecting authors’ viewpoints including 
1. <<35k have actually died from covid 
2. yet 225k-1.4m have already died from vaccines
3. With most of the paper describing why they think it is the tip of the iceberg

Their methodology for estimating vaccine caused death is hopelessly flawed, driven by an assumption that vaers death reporting is the same in the day or two after inoculation as it is months later.

And this assumption leads to artificially low background death rates and artificially high underreporting rates of 100x-500x, and producing the comically implausible estimates of between 225k and 1.4m vaccine caused deaths within 31 days of inoculation

Looking at all cause USA deaths, where are all these vaccine caused deaths hiding, especially when the vast majority of vaccinated received their inoculations between March and July, the time period woth by far the lowest excess deaths of the pandemic

From @hmatejx post below here is plot of vaccinations over time (blue) and USA deaths over time (red) — again how are these claims plausible?

Actually, the blue is vaccinations, red is cases, and the grey/black is the excess deaths over time.

I discuss this more and refute/critique the supporting document of the speaker from the FDA open session similarly claiming vaccines were killing more than they are saving using similar arguments in this blog post:

covid-datascience.com/post/do-pfizer…