Thread by @SteveDeaceShow

Memo to all corporate media and GOP politicians, who don't understand all the continued Covid vaccine hesitancy/opposition, and why you're being booed by your own base when you bring up your love for the jab. Come now, let us reason together in this thread:

If you're vaccinated and boosted and still getting that which you were supposedly vaccinated and boosted against getting, you are not vaccinated and boosted by any definition we accepted prior to marketing these products.

The traditional definition of vaccination is an immunization. The Covid jabs don't do that, and haven't since Delta as CDC admitted on CNN in August. The current data from here as well as Israel and the UK shows Covid case explosion coming among the jabbed.

Just today, in fact, our own CDC advised even jabbed Americans not to go on cruises. So if it doesn't stop me from getting it at the outset, the entire risk ratio changes.

They are actually medicines/therapies, and their effectiveness/safety profile should therefore be debated within the context of other potential treatments for similar ailments/symptoms (many of which are unethically denied).

For example, people struggle with whether to do chemotherapy because it doesn't stop you from getting cancer. If it did, the side effects and dangers of it wouldn't be debatable. It becomes debatable when you realize it's a therapy.

Most people still decide to ride the risks of chemo because cancer is such an overwhelming killer. But here we're talking about a 0.57% IFR according to our own CDC before we even stratify, thus much less for people under 75 and from there depending on your health profile.

Yet these things are marketed/imposed as a magic elixir. Hence the staunch resistance from so many critical thinkers, and that's before we even address the last 22 months of denying natural immunity -- or thousands of years of established scientific precedent.

The minuscule IFR also brings much more into focus the adverse side effects these shots may cause, which is why we're not persuaded by your charts showing how those unjabbed are most likely to die from Covid. Very few people under 75 are likely to die from Covid -- PERIOD.

So then what about the safety of this experimental tech? We know two things about that, both overly general. 1) They are rare, 2) they're also more plentiful than previous "vaccines."

Now, is that because of sheer volume, meaning we've never injected a substance more so while the rate of adverse effect remains low the overall number will be skewed greater, or is it something specific about this tech/injection?

We don't definitively know the answer, because we're not really given transparent information on that courtesy of the EUA. The vaccine injured are treated by the system like it treats former homosexuals, as in people that don't exist (or aren't permitted to be acknowledged).

You also cannot sue or get any remedy/recourse if you are vaccine injured, so all the real risk here is being assumed by the public. Along with the risk of speaking out and perhaps being de-platformed/shunned for doing so. That doesn't inspire confidence among critical thinkers.

This also explains why all the threats of job loss and mandate coercion only raised our overall rate of jabbed Americans a few percentage points the past few months. You've already reached most of the people you were going to with that, or your promotional propaganda prior.

The next group of people you're going to need to reach are only with real answers. The vast majority of us who haven't already gotten the jabs NEVER will without those answers, no matter what your threat is. And the more data we get, the more our suspicions are confirmed.

Speaking of which if you won't provide us those answers, we may very well get them from the control group known as #Omicron in real time anyway. See the data from Israel I posted here in my feed just this morning as one such example.

I conclude by asking these two questions: Do you want a dialogue or not? Do you truly want to convince us of the greatness of these jabs or not? Then you can start by simply addressing the issues presented in this thread. Otherwise, we will not be moved.