A HUGE part of why I opted for the dowdy J&J (over novel Pfizer/Moderna mRNA jab) which seemed to be less efficacious.
The central dogma may say that protein doesn’t feedback into DNA. But Reverse Transcriptase says that mRNA as protein precursor *does*.
These insane people…
I tried to share this with all of you who were trying to decide between Vaccine v COVID risk. There was no right answer because our authorities kept us from knowing. It was all down to inferences. All we could say was what was being oversold. Still don’t know about In Vivo here.
I am not a biologist, but it seems to me that our social media platforms were IMMORAL and our public health officials were IMMORAL for *mocking* our very *real* concerns and making us out to be crazy people for questioning their cheerleading for novel injections at scale.
End.
We have to be able to NOT be virologists, epidemiologists, infectious disease specialists, biologists or physicians just the way we can’t inspect all food at every link in the supply line to our table. We can’t make informed judgement w institutions blinding us. We need hearings.
And no I am NOT saying that J&J is safe. Just that we had relatively longer history with its type. It may have exactly the same problem. But we had something like three decades (1970-2000?) of experience with its type, hence my use of Dowdy because it is comparatively less novel.
And what I am responding to today in light of new research papers is the MOCKING of those of us who wanted to understand why mRNA vaccines could be *guaranteed* not to rewrite DNA. Why did we need to be mocked? Why mockery? As with the lab leak. Why?
science20.com/robert_walker/…
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.