#PrithvirajReview:
A loose attempt to establish Prithviraj as a Feminazzi who gives half of his time fighting to establish Sanyogita a part of his Darbar, making her sit beside him to listen to public complaints. Such virtue signalling was never a part of Kshatriya traditions.
//
Women used to stay in their Zenana mahal rather than being part of such gatherings.
Samrat Prithviraj is shown a brother to Maharaja Jaichandra, yet he goes on to marry his own niece. Seriously?
Ghurid army is supported by elephants while Rajputs were fighting on horses. 🙄
Just before the Jauhar, Sanyogita is shown dancing on a song. Just imagine, dramatising an emotional moment on the name of creative liberty.
Maharaja Jaichandra who built the Ram Mandir & Vishveshwar Temple Kashi is shown a Traitor, something thats just figment of imagination.
Rather than wasting precious of time of the viewers, movie makers should have given a focus on Prithviraj's exploits in establishing diplomatic relations with his adversaries in wake of an invasion to strengthen Indian defense, like one he made with Solankis of Patan.
Not a single reference of Prithviraj's identity, or his caste, or any reference to principles of Kshatriya Dharma, the whole movie is unnecessarily dramatized, which looks extremely pathetic.
Overall, it's a waste of time & an addition to long list of anti kshatriya propaganda.
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.